Comments on: From Hell: Scary Books–Part II

By: Comic Book Writers on The Simpsons « biblioklept

Comic Book Writers on The Simpsons « biblioklept — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:52:36 +0000

[...] Check out the super trio here (and take note of the prominent display of one of our favorite graphic novels ever, From Hell): [...]

By: Guy Fawkes Day and V for Vendetta « biblioklept

Guy Fawkes Day and V for Vendetta « biblioklept — Sun, 05 Nov 2006 04:30:40 +0000

[...] This afternoon I finished the first graphic novel of Alan Moore’s run writing Swamp Thing, and I can’t wait until my library hold on the second graphic novel comes in. I had no idea Saga of the Swamp Thing would be as good as it was, nor as beautifully illustrated; it’s actually much better than V for Vendetta or Moore’s other famed work, Watchmen (and none of these titles are even in the same league as Moore’s masterpiece, From Hell). Alan Moore and Steve Bissette’s run on the DC Comics series essentially led to DC’s creation of the edgier Vertigo imprint for their more “mature” titles, such as The Sandman. These titles helped to change the audiences of “comic books” and helped to make the graphic novel a new standard in the medium (no mean feat, considering the fanboyish culture of comic nerds, a culture that prizes rarity of print run over quality of storytelling). [...]

By: ed biblioklept

ed biblioklept — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:03:23 +0000

Damon, you’re spot on. Sin City worked because it recognized that the source material was excellent, and simply tried to recreate it as accurately as possible. I think a lot of Hollywood execs confuse a “property” like Batman or Spiderman with a good story, like V for Vendetta. To quote a favorite, now canceled TV show, Arrested Development: Maybe Funke, teen film exec, talking about a prospective film idea: “I can totally see that on a baseball cap.”

By: DamonNoisettejavascript:void(0);

DamonNoisettejavascript:void(0); — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:48:19 +0000

The bastardization of great ready-to-be-made material by Hollywood major studios has been a source of incredible annoyance for me. In fact, I've always been astonished at the way graphic novels have been "adapted" as opposed to simply re-enacted on screen. I mean, isn't the comic format virtually the same as a storyboard built for a scene in a movie? And if it's a successful video game with an exciting story, like Resident Evil perhaps, why not just film the cutscenes and a little exposition with real actors and call it a day? Unfortunately Alan Moore's work has been tampered with in recent film adaptations of his work, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen and, to a lesser-but-still-very-noticeable degree, the aforementioned V for Vendetta. Both of which would have made fantastic films without any rethinking/alterations. They could have saved a fortune on the screenplay because they didn't need one! Of course it takes a real troublemaker/Hollywood semi-outsider like Robert Rodriguez to make a true-to-the-material movie out of a fine graphic novel. Rodriguez knew that Sin City didn't need to be rewritten to be less dark, less disturbing, or dumber. Lucky for fans of Frank Miller and edgy film there were no compromises and Miller was brought in as a co-director. The end result: a surprisingly successful movie box office-wise (~$75million) that doesn't pander to the lowest common denominator of viewer. Bleh.

By: the longest lunch

the longest lunch — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:57:19 +0000

i’m going to check this out. glad to hear this is better than the Hughes Bros. movie. ‘cuz that were garbage.
seriously.