Comments on: Charles Bukowski

By: MC Aaron

MC Aaron — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:15:13 +0000

i’ve read all bukowski’s novels except for pulp. ham on rye is another great one.

you should watch barfly. i don’t think bukowski was pleased with mickey rourke’s performance (at least it doesn’t seem so based on hollywood), but i think barfly is a really good supplement to bukowski’s novels, and it’s probably mickey rourke’s best performance. this was at his peak as an actor, so that is saying a lot. either way, barfly, is a lot better than the film version of factotum.

have you read john fante? he was a big influence on bukowski. if you haven’t, you should borrow or steal ask the dusk from someone.

By: Alphabet Soup--Our Favorite Literary Characters (Part One) « biblioklept

Alphabet Soup--Our Favorite Literary Characters (Part One) « biblioklept — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:35:01 +0000

[...] is for Chinaski. Henry Chinaski was the alter-ego Charles Bukowski used to represent himself in his books. Chinaski was a macho coward, a drunken gambler who was [...]

By: America’s Most Commodified: Ernest Hemingway « biblioklept

America’s Most Commodified: Ernest Hemingway « biblioklept — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:48:51 +0000

[...] A few posts back, this blog turned some attention to what happens when writers become commodities sold by persona. Commodification results in a kind of lazy cultural shorthand that pre-empts the need to actually read the author and discuss their works: the author instead becomes a signifier of an abstracted ideal, a rubric of adjectives that the consumer can use to “identify” with their own life. It seems to me that no author has been more commodified than Ernest Hemingway. For example, check out The Ernest Hemingway Collection for a selection of clothes, home furnishings, and other chintzy crap. From their website: “You can now share in his spirit as an adventurer, author and romantic. His legend can be brought to your home through this entire Ernest Hemingway Collection. Every item has been hand selected and approved to ensure authenticity. Enjoy this celebration of the man and the memory.” [...]

By: the longest lunch

the longest lunch — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:02:10 +0000

i really liked Women when i read it in high school. it was plain reading, but as Damon noted, self-deprecating and funny. those aspects of the writing made it much more palatable to me than Hemingway, who i was losing interest in w/ each passing day. that said, i don't remember anything specifically about Women. there aren't any memorable characters or any lessons to be learned in any of his books, really. i think, as you correctly note, that Bukowski is more of a "brand" than a writer. a recommendation to your readers: for bad sex writing, see "Hammer of the Gods: The Led Zeppelin Saga." there's a terrible story about one of the members of the band using a red snapper in a sex act with a groupie.

By: ed biblioklept

ed biblioklept — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:55:04 +0000

Hey, Damon, check the name of this blog–biblioklept, as in book thief.
That aside, what’s the name of the bio? I feel like you might have sent it to me back in Tokyo…

By: DamonNoisettejavascript:void(0);

DamonNoisettejavascript:void(0); — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:37:18 +0000

I remember when you lent me Women back in our old college days (, chap). It inspired me to procure Post Office, Factotum. and Hollywood -- the book about the making of the slightly not-so-bad Barfly. Of the three that I own, Post Office is my favorite because it moves at a steady pace. Bukowski/Chinaski's heavy-drinking, low-paid, and constantly harassed mailman is an interesting anti-hero because he is utterly deplorable in his high times as a horse gambler but also unbreakable in spirit, no matter how much the postal service (and God) throws at him. He's a real [hu]man described in terse verse, though not quite the fake macho Übermensch of Hemingway. Chinaski is writer, a drunk, a bad fighter, and a mediocre lover. Factotum was less cohesive than Post Office, kind of jumping around multiple cities where Chinaski held menial and frustrating jobs. I'd imagine it would make a better movie than Post Office or Women because it's got more variety as far as settings; it was more situational than Women which was basically a collection of short stories of relationships with various women after Chinaski's, ahem, resurgence, joined strictly by the presence of the same main character. Women is a great read because it is so crass, truthful, self-deprecating, and hilarious. I have a Bukowski biography if you're interested. You're welcome to borrow it, though I'd prefer if you return it.