<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best and Worst Movies of 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power, Lies, and Batman &#8212; Slavoj Žižek on WikiLeaks &#124; biblioklept</title>
		<link>http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/#comment-15045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Power, Lies, and Batman &#8212; Slavoj Žižek on WikiLeaks &#124; biblioklept]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblioklept.org/?p=1470#comment-15045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Review of Books. In his intro (below), he points out why Christopher Nolan&#8217;s The Dark Knight (which we hated) is the signal film of 21st century politics and culture (thanks to A Piece of Monologue for the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Review of Books. In his intro (below), he points out why Christopher Nolan&#8217;s The Dark Knight (which we hated) is the signal film of 21st century politics and culture (thanks to A Piece of Monologue for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed biblioklept</title>
		<link>http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/#comment-7134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ed biblioklept]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblioklept.org/?p=1470#comment-7134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Unasked for) UPDATE: 
We wrote: Films we still haven’t seen but in which we have interest: Rachel Getting Married, Synecdoche, New York, Hamlet 2, Hellboy 2, The Wrestler, Quantum of Solace, Let the Right One In.

OK: 
RACHEL GETTING MARRIED: Best film of 2008 we didn&#039;t see in 2008. Loved it, cringed, strange musical, warm, moving, great, great, great.
SYNECDOCHE, NY: A brutally flawed film, depressing, depressing, depressing; overly analytical and overlong. Any goodwill Kaufman builds in the first third is completely spent by the end. Still worth seeing though.
HAMLET 2: Why did I want to see this movie? It was funny, I guess.
HELLBOY 2: Visually unique, ultimately forgettable. See THE DEVIL&#039;S BACKBONE instead.
LET THE RIGHT ONE: Great, creepy stuff. Loved it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Unasked for) UPDATE:<br />
We wrote: Films we still haven’t seen but in which we have interest: Rachel Getting Married, Synecdoche, New York, Hamlet 2, Hellboy 2, The Wrestler, Quantum of Solace, Let the Right One In.</p>
<p>OK:<br />
RACHEL GETTING MARRIED: Best film of 2008 we didn&#8217;t see in 2008. Loved it, cringed, strange musical, warm, moving, great, great, great.<br />
SYNECDOCHE, NY: A brutally flawed film, depressing, depressing, depressing; overly analytical and overlong. Any goodwill Kaufman builds in the first third is completely spent by the end. Still worth seeing though.<br />
HAMLET 2: Why did I want to see this movie? It was funny, I guess.<br />
HELLBOY 2: Visually unique, ultimately forgettable. See THE DEVIL&#8217;S BACKBONE instead.<br />
LET THE RIGHT ONE: Great, creepy stuff. Loved it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/#comment-6923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblioklept.org/?p=1470#comment-6923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not just for kids, but it is rated G - making it more open for kids than other things on the list.  And certainly an interesting topic to be presented in a G rated, marketed for kids, movie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just for kids, but it is rated G &#8211; making it more open for kids than other things on the list.  And certainly an interesting topic to be presented in a G rated, marketed for kids, movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed biblioklept</title>
		<link>http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/#comment-6920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ed biblioklept]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblioklept.org/?p=1470#comment-6920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, Damon, that &lt;em&gt;Wall-E&lt;/em&gt; is probably not for your standard kiddie audience, but Pixar films &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; marketed to children. I thought &lt;em&gt;Ratatouille&lt;/em&gt; was easily one of the best films of last year, but the general take on animated film is that it is Not Serious, or, even worse, that it is a genre, as opposed to a medium. Both of these Pixar films should be in the Best Picture category, not just Best Animated Feature (or whatever it&#039;s called). Not that I give a fuck about the Oscars, but it&#039;s a silly prejudice (comic books continue to face a similar prejudice as well).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Damon, that <em>Wall-E</em> is probably not for your standard kiddie audience, but Pixar films <em>are</em> marketed to children. I thought <em>Ratatouille</em> was easily one of the best films of last year, but the general take on animated film is that it is Not Serious, or, even worse, that it is a genre, as opposed to a medium. Both of these Pixar films should be in the Best Picture category, not just Best Animated Feature (or whatever it&#8217;s called). Not that I give a fuck about the Oscars, but it&#8217;s a silly prejudice (comic books continue to face a similar prejudice as well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/#comment-6919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblioklept.org/?p=1470#comment-6919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would hardly call &lt;i&gt;Wall-E&lt;/i&gt; a kids movie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hardly call <i>Wall-E</i> a kids movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/#comment-6918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblioklept.org/?p=1470#comment-6918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Who knew a post-apocalyptic film criticizing consumerist culture and our ever-increasing loss of connection to both the natural world an our own bodies would be so good?&quot; and for kids!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who knew a post-apocalyptic film criticizing consumerist culture and our ever-increasing loss of connection to both the natural world an our own bodies would be so good?&#8221; and for kids!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed biblioklept</title>
		<link>http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/#comment-6916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ed biblioklept]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblioklept.org/?p=1470#comment-6916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s just you.
but no, seriously, i didn&#039;t see zack and miri, but his character looks like the same character he usually plays. it would be nice to see him branch out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s just you.<br />
but no, seriously, i didn&#8217;t see zack and miri, but his character looks like the same character he usually plays. it would be nice to see him branch out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4wrdthnkndad</title>
		<link>http://biblioklept.org/2008/12/30/the-best-and-worst-movies-of-2008/#comment-6915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[4wrdthnkndad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biblioklept.org/?p=1470#comment-6915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it just me or is Seth Rogan overrated? The first few times he presents his pothead slacker charactor in movies, its funny. But isn&#039;t reasonable to see if this guy can do more than that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or is Seth Rogan overrated? The first few times he presents his pothead slacker charactor in movies, its funny. But isn&#8217;t reasonable to see if this guy can do more than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

