If, after our historically discontinuous examples of the paranoid style, we now take the long jump to the contemporary right wing, we find some rather important differences from the nineteenth-century movements. The spokesmen of those earlier movements felt that they stood for causes and personal types that were still in possession of their country—that they were fending off threats to a still established way of life. But the modern right wing…feels dispossessed: America has been largely taken away from them and their kind, though they are determined to try to repossess it and to prevent the final destructive act of subversion. The old American virtues have already been eaten away by cosmopolitans and intellectuals; the old competitive capitalism has been gradually undermined by socialistic and communistic schemers; the old national security and independence have been destroyed by treasonous plots, having as their most powerful agents not merely outsiders and foreigners as of old but major statesmen who are at the very centers of American power. Their predecessors had discovered conspiracies; the modern radical right finds conspiracy to be betrayal from on high.
From Richard Hofstadter’s 1964 essay “The Paranoid Style in American Politics.”
Biblioklept 
Reblogged this on 21st Century Theater.
LikeLike
Good one. This points up how stratified and insane the right has become (even crazier), while at the same time the corporate neoliberal agenda has been embraced by both parties. (AKA Full-on class war, rich against poor). Establishment politics left the left behind decades ago.
LikeLike
Fifty years later there are still tensions in so many directions.
LikeLike