Fabio Morábito’s Mother Tongue (Book acquired, 23 Oct. 2026)

Fabio Morábito’s collection of microfictions, Mother Tongue, is new this month from Other Press (and translator Curtis Bauer!).

Here’s “To Steal”:

WHEN I WAS THIRTEEN I WOULD STEAL MONEY FROM my parents. Every day I’d remove just enough coins to go the movies, which I’d always go to by myself, running away from the oppressive climate of my house. I’d go to the first afternoon show, when the theater was nearly empty. I don’t remember a single movie, not one title, not one image that passed in front of my eyes. I think the vague sense of being a thief kept me from enjoying the movie and I tried not to look the ticket lady in the eye, as I was certain she knew where the money that paid for the ticket came from. I hardly had any friends at that time, my performance at school had plummeted, and movies were my only comfort. I would always steal at the same time, after lunch, taking advantage of the brief nap my parents took. My hands trembled as I dug through the pockets of my father’s bag and my mother’s coin purse. I recognized by touch each coin I needed to remove and I’d take only the exact amount necessary for the ticket, not one coin more. I don’t know what impact those thefts had on my life, and I have asked myself if they might have influenced my literary inclinations; if writing has been an extension of them, because they granted me, as well as embarrassment and remorse, a tendency toward introspection that later led me to read countless books and write a few of my own. I don’t regret these thefts and I even think that in writing workshops one should be taught to steal small quantities of money, because when one writes intensely one is in fact stealing, extracting from language’s pockets the words necessary to say what one wants to say: exactly those words, and no more. Even today, after so many years, I tend to wake very early to write, while everyone else is still asleep. I don’t conceive of writing as something illustrious but as something clandestine. I look for just enough coins to escape the stifling atmosphere of the mundane. Since I get up so early, my friends admire me for my discipline.

And Other Press’s blurb:

In 84 brief, brilliant texts that combine fiction and essay, an acclaimed Mexican author examines the role of language in our lives with insight and humor.

Forced to work with used notebooks, students learn to get creative and fill the limited space.

A man makes his way through Anna Karenina in fits and starts, telling himself that he’s laying the foundation for the day he’ll read it properly.

A woman feels isolated with a husband and daughter who don’t speak her native language, and he begins to question how well he actually knows his wife.

Touching on a host of celebrated authors who shaped his life and writing—from Homer to Kafka, Camus, and Beckett—Fabio Morábito offers a delightful, multifaceted meditation on expressing ourselves through words. What do our libraries say about us? What differentiates poetry from prose? Why do interpreters forget what they translate so quickly? How can reading change us and how others see us?

Charles Addams’ Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1986

Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 3 Nov. 1986 by Charles Addams (1912-1988)

Sunday Comix

A panel from Dementia 21 (Vol. 1) by Shintaro Kago, (trans. Rachel Matt Thorne), 2018, Fantagraphics Books.

Gods, monsters, and cosmic weirdos battle for ultimate supremacy in Jesse Moynihan’s stellar graphic novel Forming

In Jesse Moynihan’s Forming, horny, neurotic, power-mad weirdos battle for supremacy, and in the process generate (and degenerate) the universe. Moynihan’s mutants can alter reality by force of will (and force of force) but they can barely manage their own appetites and grudges. It’s great fucking stuff.

Forming throws biblical genealogy, Greek succession myths, and Zoroastrian cosmology into a whirlpool of family disasters. We’ve got angels, aliens, and assassins. We’ve got giants, pissed-off proles, sudden whales and psychedelic geometric entities. We’ve got a cypher, a grinning black crescent in hot-pink boots named Nobody. Forming treats mythology as one enormous pulsing contradictory history, breaking familiar stories apart and rebuilding them as episodes in an ongoing struggle for power. The cosmic and the ridiculous are inseparable, and nobody, however exalted, is above the fray.

Moynihan’s epic begins in modest earnest ironic cartooning. Forming’s earliest pieces are one-pagers, little machines: setup, escalation, punchline. Consider this gag, in which Noah’s attempt at friendly solidarity swerves into class grievances and violent threats:

Elsewhere, Lucifer gets goosed by a ghost:

The jokes are more than tone-setting japes; they lead to worldbuilding. Atlantis emerges from labor dispute. Archangel Michael and Lucifer battle and banter in the metaphysical background. Insults, misunderstandings, and casual brutality establish cosmic hierarchies. Moynihan builds his epic sideways: setups produce universes; punchlines produce consequences.

William Blake is a clear progenitor for Forming (both visually and schematically) — particularly the Blake of The Book of Urizen and The Four Zoas, where creation begins with division and cosmic history is a rough family album chronicling the gods’ goddamned damaged relations. Throughout Blake’s mythology, the elevation of a partial perspective into absolute truth produces division and conflict.

Moynihan pricks this predicament with a spur of emphatically comic physical life. His gods and demiurges can alter reality through force of will, yet remain tangled up in their rivalries, passions, and shortsighted ambitions. Janus asks a squad of assassins: “Is the power of your belief strong enough to change this reality?” — a Blakean speculation, a nod to imaginative power — but in Forming the answer to that question might play out with somegod getting their ass whooped. Metaphysics and slapstick run on the same aesthetic engine.

One of Forming’s central concerns is the uneasy relationship between (the pretense of) divine authority and the poet/artist who attempts to describe it. This conflict has another literary progenitor in John Milton and his epic Paradise Lost — the fall, the rebellion, divine providence, all that celestial jazz. Moynihan inserts Milton into a brief episode, late in Forming, where the blind poet wrestles with the influence of his own great precursor, Homer. Moynihan’s Milton appeals to God. He needs help in forming his depiction of Michael’s battle with Satan into “something truly badass.” What muse answers?

Milton thinks he’s writing the war in Heaven. The war in Heaven is apparently writing Milton. In Forming, the inspiriting Muse might be an assassin or secret agent, Origins Unknown. Is the poet’s aesthetic vision prompted by the metaphysical, psychological, biological? Does the poet invent his material, receive it, or get recruited into somebody else’s shenanigans?

Blake, of course, had his own complicated relationship with Milton. In Milton: A Poem, the precursor poet’s influence challenges Blake to confront and transform  Milton’s theological and moral framework in favor of his own intuition and imagination. The anxiety of influence becomes a spiritual struggle: literary inheritance is something the younger poet must wrestle with rather than merely receive. Moynihan makes a comic variation on that struggle by putting Milton inside the very mythology he hopes to describe. The poet becomes another participant in the cosmic disorder, the poem its strange, self-creating artifact.

If Blake and Milton inform Forming’s theological and literary complications, Jack Kirby supplies much of the cosmic hardware. Kirby’s Fourth World comics, especially The New Gods, along with his later Marvel series The Eternals, chronicled divine genealogies and technological spectacle in a unique, Kirbyesque (forgive the tautology) visual language that other cartoonists continue to aspire to. Kirby’s gods wield weapons that look like they were designed in a mad god’s laboratory.

Forming draws on that Kirbyesque grandiosity but gives it a distinctly unruly cast. Its gods are similarly conceived as cosmic beings whose bodies, tools, and environments blur the line between divinity and machinery. Michael, Metatron, and Enoch manifest as components of a vast theological apparatus. Cosmic entities employ cool tech. But where Kirby’s monumental designs often project a sense of cosmic authority and immense structural order, Moynihan’s visual scale gestures towards slippery, fecund violent comedy and transcendent disorder. These gods are engineers, colonizers, bureaucrats, sneak thieves and warriors, dysfunctional relatives operating machinery far more sophisticated than they are. It’s all very sloppy, abject, gross. (That’s some of the highest praise I can heap.) And where Kirby’s legendary splash pages rumble like tectonic plates colliding, every punch and energy blast carrying the weight of a cosmic principle, Moynihan’s setpieces retain a playground-fight intensity that resonates with rude emotion. His combatants sound like children inventing special attacks in a backyard brawl. Celestial warfare gives us crystalline weapons and billions of years of history, the “Unblockable Strike” and “NO WAY BOZO!!” Who would not like to be there? To participate, even?

The fights are fucking awesome. Beams, blades, transformations, colossal bodies, and reality-altering attacks give physical form to the comic’s competing creation myths. There’s plenty of cool shit. Moynihan might spend pages on divine entities bickering or goofing around and then deliver a splash page of some impossible brute absolutely whaling on another impossible brute.

Forming’s grandiosity is inseparable from its ridiculousness. An ancient cosmic grievance might end with somebody getting the shit kicked out of them. Sooner or later, though, somebody has to ask whether all this spectacular violence means something or if it’s just like, fucking awesome to look at. Natch, that somebody is Nobody.

Nobody pops up with his sexy pink boots in Forming’s third act to offer metatextual commentary on how stories are made, marketed, and judged. He complains about every “rando dipstick” wanting to make “deep” art, scorns metaphor, and defends entertainment as a product designed to satisfy the broadest possible consumer base. Nommo, whose artistic vision has remade (literally reformed) the planet around them, responds by invoking the hoary old ideal of truth as the “true entertainment” worthy of the soul, higher than the gross marketplace. It’s an ideal that brings a third Dead English Poet to mind, our old dear John Keats, dead at 25, who nevertheless managed immortality with the zinger: “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all / Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.” I’ve never known quite what to make of those lines. Keats, or Keats’s speaker, puts this pronouncement about beauty and truth in the urn’s mouth, which, like, an urn doesn’t fucking have, a mouth, then leaves us wondering who gets to speak for art and whether an artwork can settle its own meaning. That radical aesthetic uncertainty tingles throughout Forming (where an urn certainly could have a mouth, I suppose), staging a loose debate about art and entertainment inside a comic full of dirty jokes and spectacular fights.

Neither position wins — the tension remains. Art might be slipped on like a fancy robe, a disguise for vanity, elitism, and self-coronation. Entertainment can become a product engineered to offend nobody while selling (out) everything. “Content” is both an economically accurate term and a little linguistic coffin into which the distinctions among art, entertainment, criticism, and advertising are tossed (but left unburied).

Moynihan gives himself plenty of room on both sides of the argument. Forming is full of metaphor, philosophy, theological speculation, colossal ambition, and authorial indulgence. It is also full of goofy monsters and obscene punchlines. It wants William Blake and “FUCK YOU GHOST!” It wants Miltonic prophecy and the awesome-shit spectacle of the Unblockable Strike. Its vulgarity is part and parcel of its take on creation, authority, and the desire to make something — art, entertainment, a really cool fucking comic — that other people will take seriously.

Here, Moynihan has something in common with Johnny Ryan and Benjamin Marra, cartoonists whose rough, vulgar surfaces refuse the tasteful separation of trash from art. Ryan’s comics run on unchecked appetite and endless bodily mutation; Marra pushes macho heroics past competence and into ritual. Moynihan is less relentlessly abrasive than Ryan and less committed to Marra’s deadpan masculine theater, but all three understand the expressive possibilities of crudity. An ugly body can puncture heroic pretensions, and an obscene joke can expose the absurdities hidden inside an exalted idea.

In Forming, that crudity brings the sacred insistently back to the body. Moynihan’s gods boast, reproduce, misunderstand instructions, hunger, shit, threaten strangers, and become trapped in forms they cannot control. For all their power, they remain subject to the vanity and confusion animating the comic’s smallest disputes. Even the most exalted being can wind up looking like an idiot. Or really fucking cool. Or really fucking cool and idiotic at the same time.

The comic’s shifting visual forms accommodate these sudden collapses of scale and dignity. Its pages move between compressed gag-strip grids and visionary spectacle, from cramped exchanges of insults to enormous abysses and burning colossi. Moynihan employs a nine-panel grid on most pages, establishing a rhythm of setup and punchline; his dramatic splash pages break out of that rhythm. Underground-comic crudity, psychedelic Hanna-Barbera, and Fletcher Hanks’s grotesque distortions haunt the visual mix, but by the book’s end Moynihan has pushed that unruliness toward something luminous and hallucinatory: the cosmic geometries of Kilian Eng, the psychedelic expansiveness of Moebius, even a Goethean drama of color and perception. The changes in scale become changes in visual logic, as the gag-strip machinery opens onto vast, unstable fields of color, form, and energy.

It all adds up to something genuinely and unexpectedly moving. Moynihan began Forming as a webcomic in 2009 and worked on it, intermittently and with increasing formal ambition, for seventeen years. Over that time, one gag opened onto another creation myth, one family grievance sparked another cosmic war, and each new generation inherited the wreckage of the last. The accumulation of jokes, betrayals, mutations, and apocalyptic battles gradually became an immense, deeply peculiar vision of creation, sustained by Moynihan’s willingness to keep expanding it without ever taming its absurdity.

Fantagraphics’ new complete edition gives that long undertaking an appropriately beautiful physical form. At 448 full-color pages, the hardcover is substantial without becoming unwieldy, handsomely printed and remarkably easy to read despite the density of Moynihan’s cosmology. The crisp reproduction and generous page size let the colors blaze, the crowded grids breathe, and the sudden splashes achieve their full scale. In this latest, perhaps final form, Forming is a masterful achievement.

Yet the book’s arrival at a finished form does not mean that its contradictions settle into place. There is something tender in the persistence with which Moynihan carries these oppositions and eruptions through cosmic violence, deranged theology, and dubious ambition. Forming ultimately suggests that these tensions might be carried forward only by passing into another form. The sacred and the stupid occupy the same panel, sometimes the same body. Creation is an ongoing accident, forever producing creatures who misunderstand the world, alter it, and occasionally reach for one another as everything comes apart in a ridiculous and tender gesture.

Beautiful, bewildering, hilarious, and unexpectedly affecting, Forming is very highly recommended.

William Joyce’s Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1994

Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 31 Oct. 1994 by William Joyce (b. 1957)

Read Donald Barthelme’s horror/comedy short story “The School”

“The School” by

Donald Barthelme


Well, we had all these children out planting trees, see, because we figured that … that was part of their education, to see how, you know, the root systems … and also the sense of responsibility, taking care of things, being individually responsible. You know what I mean. And the trees all died. They were orange trees. I don’t know why they died, they just died. Something wrong with the soil possibly or maybe the stuff we got from the nursery wasn’t the best. We complained about it. So we’ve got thirty kids there, each kid had his or her own little tree to plant and we’ve got these thirty dead trees. All these kids looking at these little brown sticks, it was depressing.

It wouldn’t have been so bad except that just a couple of weeks before the thing with the trees, the snakes all died. But I think that the snakes – well, the reason that the snakes kicked off was that … you remember, the boiler was shut off for four days because of the strike, and that was explicable. It was something you could explain to the kids because of the strike. I mean, none of their parents would let them cross the picket line and they knew there was a strike going on and what it meant. So when things got started up again and we found the snakes they weren’t too disturbed.

With the herb gardens it was probably a case of overwatering, and at least now they know not to overwater. The children were very conscientious with the herb gardens and some of them probably … you know, slipped them a little extra water when we weren’t looking. Or maybe … well, I don’t like to think about sabotage, although it did occur to us. I mean, it was something that crossed our minds. We were thinking that way probably because before that the gerbils had died, and the white mice had died, and the salamander … well, now they know not to carry them around in plastic bags.

Of course we expected the tropical fish to die, that was no surprise. Those numbers, you look at them crooked and they’re belly-up on the surface. But the lesson plan called for a tropical fish input at that point, there was nothing we could do, it happens every year, you just have to hurry past it.

We weren’t even supposed to have a puppy.

We weren’t even supposed to have one, it was just a puppy the Murdoch girl found under a Gristede’s truck one day and she was afraid the truck would run over it when the driver had finished making his delivery, so she stuck it in her knapsack and brought it to the school with her. So we had this puppy. As soon as I saw the puppy I thought, Oh Christ, I bet it will live for about two weeks and then… And that’s what it did. It wasn’t supposed to be in the classroom at all, there’s some kind of regulation about it, but you can’t tell them they can’t have a puppy when the puppy is already there, right in front of them, running around on the floor and yap yap yapping. They named it Edgar – that is, they named it after me. They had a lot of fun running after it and yelling, “Here, Edgar! Nice Edgar!” Then they’d laugh like hell. They enjoyed the ambiguity. I enjoyed it myself. I don’t mind being kidded. They made a little house for it in the supply closet and all that. I don’t know what it died of. Distemper, I guess. It probably hadn’t had any shots. I got it out of there before the kids got to school. I checked the supply closet each morning, routinely, because I knew what was going to happen. I gave it to the custodian.

And then there was this Korean orphan that the class adopted through the Help the Children program, all the kids brought in a quarter a month, that was the idea. It was an unfortunate thing, the kid’s name was Kim and maybe we adopted him too late or something. The cause of death was not stated in the letter we got, they suggested we adopt another child instead and sent us some interesting case histories, but we didn’t have the heart. The class took it pretty hard, they began (I think, nobody ever said anything to me directly) to feel that maybe there was something wrong with the school. But I don’t think there’s anything wrong with the school, particularly, I’ve seen better and I’ve seen worse. It was just a run of bad luck. We had an extraordinary number of parents passing away, for instance. There were I think two heart attacks and two suicides, one drowning, and four killed together in a car accident. One stroke. And we had the usual heavy mortality rate among the grandparents, or maybe it was heavier this year, it seemed so. And finally the tragedy.

The tragedy occurred when Matthew Wein and Tony Mavrogordo were playing over where they’re excavating for the new federal office building. There were all these big wooden beams stacked, you know, at the edge of the excavation. There’s a court case coming out of that, the parents are claiming that the beams were poorly stacked. I don’t know what’s true and what’s not. It’s been a strange year.

I forgot to mention Billy Brandt’s father who was knifed fatally when he grappled with a masked intruder in his home.

One day, we had a discussion in class. They asked me, where did they go? The trees, the salamander, the tropical fish, Edgar, the poppas and mommas, Matthew and Tony, where did they go? And I said, I don’t know, I don’t know. And they said, who knows? and I said, nobody knows. And they said, is death that which gives meaning to life? And I said no, life is that which gives meaning to life. Then they said, but isn’t death, considered as a fundamental datum, the means by which the taken-for-granted mundanity of the everyday may be transcended in the direction of –

I said, yes, maybe.

They said, we don’t like it.

I said, that’s sound.

They said, it’s a bloody shame!

I said, it is.

They said, will you make love now with Helen (our teaching assistant) so that we can see how it is done?

We know you like Helen.

I do like Helen but I said that I would not.

We’ve heard so much about it, they said, but we’ve never seen it.

I said I would be fired and that it was never, or almost never, done as a demonstration. Helen looked out the window.

They said, please, please make love with Helen, we require an assertion of value, we are frightened.

I said that they shouldn’t be frightened (although I am often frightened) and that there was value everywhere.

Helen came and embraced me. I kissed her a few times on the brow. We held each other. The children were excited. Then there was a knock on the door, I opened the door, and the new gerbil walked in. The children cheered wildly.

Sunday Comix

A panel from The Squirrel Machine by Hans Rickheit, 2013, Fantagraphics Books.

Charles Addams’ Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1963

Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 2 Nov. 1963 by Charles Addams (1912-1988)

Perry Barlow’s Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1947

Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1 Nov. 1947 by Perry Barlow (1892-1977)

“Pronouns” — Tom Clark

 

PRONOUNS Pronouns respect persons.

“Pronouns”

by

Tom Clark


Pronouns
respect
persons.

Read “The Fifth Story,” a very short metafictional horror story (or five) by Clarice Lispector

“The Fifth Story”

by

Clarice Lispector

translated

by Giovanni Pontiero


This story could be called “The Statues.” Another possible title would be “The Killing.” Or even “How to Kill Cockroaches.” So I shall tell at least three stories, all of them true, because none of the three will contradict the others. Although they constitute one story, they could become a thousand and one, were I to be granted a thousand and one nights.

The first story, “How To Kill Cockroaches,” begins like this: I was complaining about the cockroaches. A woman heard me complain. She gave me a recipe for killing them. I was to mix together equal quantities of sugar, flour and gypsum. The flour and sugar would attract the cockroaches, the gypsum would dry up their insides. I followed her advice. The cockroaches died.

The next story is really the first, and it is called “The Killing.” It begins like this: I was complaining about the cockroaches. A woman heard me complain. The recipe follows. And then the killing takes place. The truth is that I had only complained in abstract terms about the cockroaches, for they were not even mine: they belonged to the ground floor and climbed up the pipes in the building into our apartment. It was only when I prepared the mixture that they also became mine. On our behalf, therefore, I began to measure and weigh ingredients with greater concentration. A vague loathing had taken possession of me, a sense of outrage. By day, the cockroaches were invisible and no one would believe in the evil secret which eroded such a tranquil household. But if the cockroaches, like evil secrets, slept by day, there I was preparing their nightly poison. Meticulous, eager, I prepared the elixir of prolonged death. An angry fear and my own evil secret guided me. Now I coldly wanted one thing only: to kill every cockroach in existence. Cockroaches climb up the pipes while weary people sleep. And now the recipe was ready, looking so white. As if I were dealing with cockroaches as cunning as myself, I carefully spread the powder until it looked like part of the surface dust. From my bed, in the silence of the apartment, I imagined them climbing up one by one into the kitchen where darkness slept, a solitary towel alert on the clothesline. I awoke hours later, startled at having overslept. It was beginning to grow light. I walked across the kitchen. There they lay on the floor of the scullery, huge and brittle. During the night I had killed them. On our behalf, it was beginning to grow light. On a nearby hill, a cockerel crowed.

The third story which now begins is called “The Statues.” It begins by saying that I had been complaining about the cockroaches. Then the same woman appears on the scene. And so it goes on to the point where I awake as it is beginning to grow light, and I awake still feeling sleepy and I walk across the kitchen. Even more sleepy is the scullery floor with its tiled perspective. And in the shadows of dawn, there is a purplish hue which distances everything; at my feet, I perceive patches of light and shade, scores of rigid statues scattered everywhere. The cockroaches that have hardened from core to shell. Some are lying upside down. Others arrested in the midst of some movement (hat will never be completed. In the mouths of some of the cockroaches, there are traces of white powder. I am the first to observe the dawn breaking over Pompei. I know what this night has been, I know about the orgy in the dark. In some, the gypsum has hardened as slowly as in some organic process, and the cockroaches, with ever more tortuous movements, have greedily intensified the night’s pleasures, trying to escape from their insides. Until they turn to stone, in innocent terror and with such, but such an expression of pained reproach. Others—suddenly assailed by their own core, without even having perceived that their inner form was turning to stone!—these are suddenly crystallized, just like a word arrested on someone’s lips: I love . . . The cockroaches, invoking the name of love in vain, sang on a summer’s night. While the cockroach over there, the one with the brown antennae smeared with white, must have realized too late that it had become mummified precisely because it did not know how to use things with the gratuitous grace of the in vain: “It is just that I looked too closely inside myself! It is just that I looked too closely inside …” From my frigid height as a human being, I watch the destruction of a world. Dawn breaks. Here and there, the parched antennae of dead cockroaches quiver in the breeze. The cockerel from the previous story crows.

The fourth story opens a new era in the household. The story begins as usual: I was complaining about the cockroaches. It goes on up to the point when I see the statues in plaster of Paris. Inevitably dead. I look toward the pipes where this same night an infestation will reappear, swarming slowly upwards in Indian file. Should I renew the lethal sugar every night? like someone who no longer sleeps without the avidity of some rite. And should I take myself somnambulant out to the terrace early each morning? in my craving to encounter the statues which my perspiring night has erected. I trembled with a depraved pleasure at the vision of my double existence as a witch. I also trembled at the sight of that hardening gypsum, the depravity of existence which would shatter my internal form.

The grim moment of choosing between two paths, which I thought would separate, convinced that any choice would mean sacrificing either myself or my soul. I chose. And today I secretly carry a plaque of virtue in my heart: “This house has been disinfected.”

The fifth story is called “Leibnitz and the Transcendence of Love in Polynesia.” It begins like this: I was complaining about the cockroaches.

Sunday Comix

“Horror Story” by Eddie Campbell. Published in Taboo Especial, Spiderbaby Grafix & Publications, 1991.

Blog about some recent reading

 

I reread Jesse Moynihan’s epic psychedelic graphic novel Forming from in full last night, staying up too late in doing so.

I’d read it in parcels and chunks over the nearly two decades Moynihan worked on it; I also read it in consistent chunky episodes over the past few months, when the nice people (nice person, you know who you are man) sent me a copy of its completed Forming form. But I hadn’t read it from soup to nuts, aye aye to zee, you get me, yeah, until last night.

I will do a proper review of Forming I swear I swear I swear, but reading it through I was genuinely moved, not just by the sheer accomplishment of the thing, the way Moynihan brings his teeming Blakean pantheon of gods and demiurges to heel (or whatever appendage) across an epic of cosmic creation and destruction, but by the weird, tender persistence of the whole enterprise. A comprehensive summary is not necessary (by which I mean too hard for me to muster right now) but–

Forming is William Blake’s prophetic books macrodosed on that good shit, raised on psychedelic Hanna-Barbera cartoons and Fletcher Hanks comics, gods and monsters and angels and demons doing metaphysical slapstick; grotesque, hilarious, strangely beautifully strange.

I’m halfway through The Disappearers by Marlon James. This book got a New York Times review so glowing that it melted half of what’s left of altlittwitter into an incandescent mean girl pose for about five minutes. (I think the vibe has moved on.) That’s my way of saying that no one needs my own take on this.

I’m not gonna lie, the second section of The Disappearers, “The Blackjacks,” was so ugly that I had to take a short lil break and, like, read something else. That was the intention, of course. The novel is painfully real and hurts with a clarity absent from James’s recent Black Leopard novels, which, if I’m honest, I enjoy more. (I have connected very much to James’s evocation of late-eighties-transitioning-to-nineties nostalgia: the music, the grunge, the fear, the Chris Claremont’s Uncanny X-Men of it all.)

Back to the stack, natch: I already reviewed Grace Krilanovich’s Acid Green Velvet, a fantastic novel where

nearly everyone is trying to invent a new self. Tramps become philosophers, grifters become visionaries, labor organizers become prophets, mystics become entrepreneurs, and wealthy eccentrics attempt to turn private fantasies into reality. Set in a fictional California town called Anzar, the novel follows these competing acts of self-creation as they collide, overlap, and occasionally explode.

Loved it loved it loved it, gotta shelve it now.

Goodbye to Goodbye is a new collection of Stephen Dixon’s “greatest hits” (McSweeney’s, the publisher, has not characterized the volume that way). I have a rough draft of a review forthcoming, but basically, if you have any interest in Stephen Dixon, this ain’t a bad place to start. (I will expound upon why you might want to start into Dixon in that review; for now, check out “Frog in Prague,” in which our autofictional hero tries to get to Kafka’s grave.)

Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up to Me by Richard Fariña — I finally read it. I read it because of Thomas Pynchon, who may or may not be the basis of a character in the novel, but who definitely wrote an introduction for it, in my edition and I’m guessing every edition after the first, and who definitely was not Fariña’s best friend or roommate, as the internet somewhat persists in reporting. A drug novel, a would-be travel novel, but really just (just?) a campus novel, Been Down is the kind of jam I would’ve thought profound when I was 20, 21; mostly I found its hero Gnossos Pappadopoulis to be a boor and an asshole — although I think that was also maybe kinda the point. It was often very funny. But not great!

I read Stanley Crawford’s 1978 “novel” Some Instructions to My Wife: Concerning the Upkeep of the House and Marriage, and to My Son and Daughter Concerning the Conduct of Their Childhood over two afternoons. I think Crawford is the best novelist no one has read (not you, dear reader, I know you’re hip to Crawford, Ole Ess Cee) — just a mean satirical hooting raspberry directed at middle-class American values. Makes a nice surreal trilogy with Crawford’s other slim novels The Log of the S.S. The Mrs Unguentine (1972) and Petroleum Man (2005).

Diane Williams’ latest is I Liked Rex. I had been reading one of Williams’ weird microslices a day for a while, until my attention shifted elsewhere, through no fault of Williams or Rex. Here is

“In the Bright Valley”

by

Diane Williams

He is a young man getting in a little extra sleep before the evening, which helps him to feel gen-erous warmth toward others—and to feel opti-mistic.

He had been down on his back on the narrow bench, with his arms hanging down to the floor, and he had taken a nap in the locker room, where he also eats his lunch.

On the job he doesn’t deal with the butter, which builds into a mountain in a glassed-in room, where claws dip down into it.

He minds the milk, and if he is not quick enough, it spouts and spills, because the packs of milk may fall out of their baskets and break open while they rush toward him.

He does have a panic button to push that brings in a lot of help—the people with mops and buckets—but his shoes and overalls did get wet this morning.

A deluge can create a deeply affecting mood— which this young man undergoes solely as glit-tering.

 

 

“On Walking Backwards” — Anne Carson

On Walking Backwards

My mother forbade us to walk backwards. That is how the dead walk, she would say. Where did she get this idea? Perhaps from a bad translation. The dead, after all, do not walk backwards but they do walk behind us. They have no lungs and cannot call out but would love for us to turn around. They are victims of love, many of them.

“Sumptuous Destitution” — Anne Carson

“Sumptuous Destitution”

by

Anne Carson


“Sumptuous destitution”

Your opinion gives me a serious feeling. I would like to be what you deem me.

(Emily Dickinson letter 319 to Thomas Higginson)

is a phrase

You see my position is benighted.

(Emily Dickinson letter 268 to Thomas Higginson)

scholars use

She was too enigmatical a being for me to solve in an hours interview.

(Thomas Higginson letter 342a to Emily Dickinson)

of female

God made me [Sir] Master—I didn’t be—myself.

(Emily Dickinson letter 233 to Thomas Higginson)

silence.

Rushing among my small heart—and pushing aside the blood—

(Emily Dickinson letter 248 to Thomas Higginson)

Save what you can, Emily.

And when I try to organize—my little Force explodes—and leaves me bare and charred.

(Emily Dickinson letter 271 to Thomas Higginson)

Save every bit of thread.

Have you a little chest to put the Alive in?

(Emily Dickinson letter 233 to Thomas Higginson)

One of them may be

By Cock, said Ophelia.

(Emily Dickinson letter 268 to Thomas Higginson)

the way out of here

Tortuga — Jacobo Borges

Tortuga, 1951 by Jacobo Borges (b. 1931)

Sunday Comix

A panel from Pim & Francie: The Golden Bear Days by Al Columbia, Fantagraphics Books, 2009.