Untitled (Portrait of William H. Gass) — Dmitry Samarov

Untiled (Portrait of William H. Gass), 2026 by Dmitry Samarov (b. 1970)

Sunday Comix

A “Mope & Grope” story by David Mazzucchelli. From Rubber Blanket #1, Rubber Blanket Press, 1991.

They know it’s Halloween | Gasoline Alley

A Gasoline Alley strip by Frank King, 1927. Republished in Drawn & Quarterly #1 (Vol. 3), 2000.

Strange Brew, Charles Burns’ Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1993

Halloween cover for The New Yorker (“Strange Brew”), 1 Nov. 1993 by Charles Burns (b. 1955)

 

Fabio Morábito’s Mother Tongue (Book acquired, 23 Oct. 2026)

Fabio Morábito’s collection of microfictions, Mother Tongue, is new this month from Other Press (and translator Curtis Bauer!).

Here’s “To Steal”:

WHEN I WAS THIRTEEN I WOULD STEAL MONEY FROM my parents. Every day I’d remove just enough coins to go the movies, which I’d always go to by myself, running away from the oppressive climate of my house. I’d go to the first afternoon show, when the theater was nearly empty. I don’t remember a single movie, not one title, not one image that passed in front of my eyes. I think the vague sense of being a thief kept me from enjoying the movie and I tried not to look the ticket lady in the eye, as I was certain she knew where the money that paid for the ticket came from. I hardly had any friends at that time, my performance at school had plummeted, and movies were my only comfort. I would always steal at the same time, after lunch, taking advantage of the brief nap my parents took. My hands trembled as I dug through the pockets of my father’s bag and my mother’s coin purse. I recognized by touch each coin I needed to remove and I’d take only the exact amount necessary for the ticket, not one coin more. I don’t know what impact those thefts had on my life, and I have asked myself if they might have influenced my literary inclinations; if writing has been an extension of them, because they granted me, as well as embarrassment and remorse, a tendency toward introspection that later led me to read countless books and write a few of my own. I don’t regret these thefts and I even think that in writing workshops one should be taught to steal small quantities of money, because when one writes intensely one is in fact stealing, extracting from language’s pockets the words necessary to say what one wants to say: exactly those words, and no more. Even today, after so many years, I tend to wake very early to write, while everyone else is still asleep. I don’t conceive of writing as something illustrious but as something clandestine. I look for just enough coins to escape the stifling atmosphere of the mundane. Since I get up so early, my friends admire me for my discipline.

And Other Press’s blurb:

In 84 brief, brilliant texts that combine fiction and essay, an acclaimed Mexican author examines the role of language in our lives with insight and humor.

Forced to work with used notebooks, students learn to get creative and fill the limited space.

A man makes his way through Anna Karenina in fits and starts, telling himself that he’s laying the foundation for the day he’ll read it properly.

A woman feels isolated with a husband and daughter who don’t speak her native language, and he begins to question how well he actually knows his wife.

Touching on a host of celebrated authors who shaped his life and writing—from Homer to Kafka, Camus, and Beckett—Fabio Morábito offers a delightful, multifaceted meditation on expressing ourselves through words. What do our libraries say about us? What differentiates poetry from prose? Why do interpreters forget what they translate so quickly? How can reading change us and how others see us?

Charles Addams’ Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1986

Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 3 Nov. 1986 by Charles Addams (1912-1988)

Sunday Comix

A panel from Dementia 21 (Vol. 1) by Shintaro Kago, (trans. Rachel Matt Thorne), 2018, Fantagraphics Books.

Gods, monsters, and cosmic weirdos battle for ultimate supremacy in Jesse Moynihan’s stellar graphic novel Forming

In Jesse Moynihan’s Forming, horny, neurotic, power-mad weirdos battle for supremacy, and in the process generate (and degenerate) the universe. Moynihan’s mutants can alter reality by force of will (and force of force) but they can barely manage their own appetites and grudges. It’s great fucking stuff.

Forming throws biblical genealogy, Greek succession myths, and Zoroastrian cosmology into a whirlpool of family disasters. We’ve got angels, aliens, and assassins. We’ve got giants, pissed-off proles, sudden whales and psychedelic geometric entities. We’ve got a cypher, a grinning black crescent in hot-pink boots named Nobody. Forming treats mythology as one enormous pulsing contradictory history, breaking familiar stories apart and rebuilding them as episodes in an ongoing struggle for power. The cosmic and the ridiculous are inseparable, and nobody, however exalted, is above the fray.

Moynihan’s epic begins in modest earnest ironic cartooning. Forming’s earliest pieces are one-pagers, little machines: setup, escalation, punchline. Consider this gag, in which Noah’s attempt at friendly solidarity swerves into class grievances and violent threats:

Elsewhere, Lucifer gets goosed by a ghost:

The jokes are more than tone-setting japes; they lead to worldbuilding. Atlantis emerges from labor dispute. Archangel Michael and Lucifer battle and banter in the metaphysical background. Insults, misunderstandings, and casual brutality establish cosmic hierarchies. Moynihan builds his epic sideways: setups produce universes; punchlines produce consequences.

William Blake is a clear progenitor for Forming (both visually and schematically) — particularly the Blake of The Book of Urizen and The Four Zoas, where creation begins with division and cosmic history is a rough family album chronicling the gods’ goddamned damaged relations. Throughout Blake’s mythology, the elevation of a partial perspective into absolute truth produces division and conflict.

Moynihan pricks this predicament with a spur of emphatically comic physical life. His gods and demiurges can alter reality through force of will, yet remain tangled up in their rivalries, passions, and shortsighted ambitions. Janus asks a squad of assassins: “Is the power of your belief strong enough to change this reality?” — a Blakean speculation, a nod to imaginative power — but in Forming the answer to that question might play out with somegod getting their ass whooped. Metaphysics and slapstick run on the same aesthetic engine.

One of Forming’s central concerns is the uneasy relationship between (the pretense of) divine authority and the poet/artist who attempts to describe it. This conflict has another literary progenitor in John Milton and his epic Paradise Lost — the fall, the rebellion, divine providence, all that celestial jazz. Moynihan inserts Milton into a brief episode, late in Forming, where the blind poet wrestles with the influence of his own great precursor, Homer. Moynihan’s Milton appeals to God. He needs help in forming his depiction of Michael’s battle with Satan into “something truly badass.” What muse answers?

Milton thinks he’s writing the war in Heaven. The war in Heaven is apparently writing Milton. In Forming, the inspiriting Muse might be an assassin or secret agent, Origins Unknown. Is the poet’s aesthetic vision prompted by the metaphysical, psychological, biological? Does the poet invent his material, receive it, or get recruited into somebody else’s shenanigans?

Blake, of course, had his own complicated relationship with Milton. In Milton: A Poem, the precursor poet’s influence challenges Blake to confront and transform  Milton’s theological and moral framework in favor of his own intuition and imagination. The anxiety of influence becomes a spiritual struggle: literary inheritance is something the younger poet must wrestle with rather than merely receive. Moynihan makes a comic variation on that struggle by putting Milton inside the very mythology he hopes to describe. The poet becomes another participant in the cosmic disorder, the poem its strange, self-creating artifact.

If Blake and Milton inform Forming’s theological and literary complications, Jack Kirby supplies much of the cosmic hardware. Kirby’s Fourth World comics, especially The New Gods, along with his later Marvel series The Eternals, chronicled divine genealogies and technological spectacle in a unique, Kirbyesque (forgive the tautology) visual language that other cartoonists continue to aspire to. Kirby’s gods wield weapons that look like they were designed in a mad god’s laboratory.

Forming draws on that Kirbyesque grandiosity but gives it a distinctly unruly cast. Its gods are similarly conceived as cosmic beings whose bodies, tools, and environments blur the line between divinity and machinery. Michael, Metatron, and Enoch manifest as components of a vast theological apparatus. Cosmic entities employ cool tech. But where Kirby’s monumental designs often project a sense of cosmic authority and immense structural order, Moynihan’s visual scale gestures towards slippery, fecund violent comedy and transcendent disorder. These gods are engineers, colonizers, bureaucrats, sneak thieves and warriors, dysfunctional relatives operating machinery far more sophisticated than they are. It’s all very sloppy, abject, gross. (That’s some of the highest praise I can heap.) And where Kirby’s legendary splash pages rumble like tectonic plates colliding, every punch and energy blast carrying the weight of a cosmic principle, Moynihan’s setpieces retain a playground-fight intensity that resonates with rude emotion. His combatants sound like children inventing special attacks in a backyard brawl. Celestial warfare gives us crystalline weapons and billions of years of history, the “Unblockable Strike” and “NO WAY BOZO!!” Who would not like to be there? To participate, even?

The fights are fucking awesome. Beams, blades, transformations, colossal bodies, and reality-altering attacks give physical form to the comic’s competing creation myths. There’s plenty of cool shit. Moynihan might spend pages on divine entities bickering or goofing around and then deliver a splash page of some impossible brute absolutely whaling on another impossible brute.

Forming’s grandiosity is inseparable from its ridiculousness. An ancient cosmic grievance might end with somebody getting the shit kicked out of them. Sooner or later, though, somebody has to ask whether all this spectacular violence means something or if it’s just like, fucking awesome to look at. Natch, that somebody is Nobody.

Nobody pops up with his sexy pink boots in Forming’s third act to offer metatextual commentary on how stories are made, marketed, and judged. He complains about every “rando dipstick” wanting to make “deep” art, scorns metaphor, and defends entertainment as a product designed to satisfy the broadest possible consumer base. Nommo, whose artistic vision has remade (literally reformed) the planet around them, responds by invoking the hoary old ideal of truth as the “true entertainment” worthy of the soul, higher than the gross marketplace. It’s an ideal that brings a third Dead English Poet to mind, our old dear John Keats, dead at 25, who nevertheless managed immortality with the zinger: “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all / Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.” I’ve never known quite what to make of those lines. Keats, or Keats’s speaker, puts this pronouncement about beauty and truth in the urn’s mouth, which, like, an urn doesn’t fucking have, a mouth, then leaves us wondering who gets to speak for art and whether an artwork can settle its own meaning. That radical aesthetic uncertainty tingles throughout Forming (where an urn certainly could have a mouth, I suppose), staging a loose debate about art and entertainment inside a comic full of dirty jokes and spectacular fights.

Neither position wins — the tension remains. Art might be slipped on like a fancy robe, a disguise for vanity, elitism, and self-coronation. Entertainment can become a product engineered to offend nobody while selling (out) everything. “Content” is both an economically accurate term and a little linguistic coffin into which the distinctions among art, entertainment, criticism, and advertising are tossed (but left unburied).

Moynihan gives himself plenty of room on both sides of the argument. Forming is full of metaphor, philosophy, theological speculation, colossal ambition, and authorial indulgence. It is also full of goofy monsters and obscene punchlines. It wants William Blake and “FUCK YOU GHOST!” It wants Miltonic prophecy and the awesome-shit spectacle of the Unblockable Strike. Its vulgarity is part and parcel of its take on creation, authority, and the desire to make something — art, entertainment, a really cool fucking comic — that other people will take seriously.

Here, Moynihan has something in common with Johnny Ryan and Benjamin Marra, cartoonists whose rough, vulgar surfaces refuse the tasteful separation of trash from art. Ryan’s comics run on unchecked appetite and endless bodily mutation; Marra pushes macho heroics past competence and into ritual. Moynihan is less relentlessly abrasive than Ryan and less committed to Marra’s deadpan masculine theater, but all three understand the expressive possibilities of crudity. An ugly body can puncture heroic pretensions, and an obscene joke can expose the absurdities hidden inside an exalted idea.

In Forming, that crudity brings the sacred insistently back to the body. Moynihan’s gods boast, reproduce, misunderstand instructions, hunger, shit, threaten strangers, and become trapped in forms they cannot control. For all their power, they remain subject to the vanity and confusion animating the comic’s smallest disputes. Even the most exalted being can wind up looking like an idiot. Or really fucking cool. Or really fucking cool and idiotic at the same time.

The comic’s shifting visual forms accommodate these sudden collapses of scale and dignity. Its pages move between compressed gag-strip grids and visionary spectacle, from cramped exchanges of insults to enormous abysses and burning colossi. Moynihan employs a nine-panel grid on most pages, establishing a rhythm of setup and punchline; his dramatic splash pages break out of that rhythm. Underground-comic crudity, psychedelic Hanna-Barbera, and Fletcher Hanks’s grotesque distortions haunt the visual mix, but by the book’s end Moynihan has pushed that unruliness toward something luminous and hallucinatory: the cosmic geometries of Kilian Eng, the psychedelic expansiveness of Moebius, even a Goethean drama of color and perception. The changes in scale become changes in visual logic, as the gag-strip machinery opens onto vast, unstable fields of color, form, and energy.

It all adds up to something genuinely and unexpectedly moving. Moynihan began Forming as a webcomic in 2009 and worked on it, intermittently and with increasing formal ambition, for seventeen years. Over that time, one gag opened onto another creation myth, one family grievance sparked another cosmic war, and each new generation inherited the wreckage of the last. The accumulation of jokes, betrayals, mutations, and apocalyptic battles gradually became an immense, deeply peculiar vision of creation, sustained by Moynihan’s willingness to keep expanding it without ever taming its absurdity.

Fantagraphics’ new complete edition gives that long undertaking an appropriately beautiful physical form. At 448 full-color pages, the hardcover is substantial without becoming unwieldy, handsomely printed and remarkably easy to read despite the density of Moynihan’s cosmology. The crisp reproduction and generous page size let the colors blaze, the crowded grids breathe, and the sudden splashes achieve their full scale. In this latest, perhaps final form, Forming is a masterful achievement.

Yet the book’s arrival at a finished form does not mean that its contradictions settle into place. There is something tender in the persistence with which Moynihan carries these oppositions and eruptions through cosmic violence, deranged theology, and dubious ambition. Forming ultimately suggests that these tensions might be carried forward only by passing into another form. The sacred and the stupid occupy the same panel, sometimes the same body. Creation is an ongoing accident, forever producing creatures who misunderstand the world, alter it, and occasionally reach for one another as everything comes apart in a ridiculous and tender gesture.

Beautiful, bewildering, hilarious, and unexpectedly affecting, Forming is very highly recommended.

William Joyce’s Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1994

Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 31 Oct. 1994 by William Joyce (b. 1957)

Sunday Comix

A panel from The Squirrel Machine by Hans Rickheit, 2013, Fantagraphics Books.

Charles Addams’ Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1963

Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 2 Nov. 1963 by Charles Addams (1912-1988)

Perry Barlow’s Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1947

Halloween cover for The New Yorker, 1 Nov. 1947 by Perry Barlow (1892-1977)

Sunday Comix

“Horror Story” by Eddie Campbell. Published in Taboo Especial, Spiderbaby Grafix & Publications, 1991.

Tortuga — Jacobo Borges

Tortuga, 1951 by Jacobo Borges (b. 1931)

Sunday Comix

A panel from Pim & Francie: The Golden Bear Days by Al Columbia, Fantagraphics Books, 2009.

Sunday Comix

A few panels from “What an Interesting City!” by Julie Doucet. Published in Dirty Plotte #5, May 1992, Drawn & Quarterly.

 

Untitled — Lucas Samaras

Untitled, 1970 by Lucas Samaras (1936–2024)