Yeggs, grifters, and revolutionaries scheme and dream in Grace Krilanovich’s excellent new novel Acid Green Velvet

In Grace Krilanovich’s Acid Green Velvet, nearly everyone is trying to invent a new self. Tramps become philosophers, grifters become visionaries, labor organizers become prophets, mystics become entrepreneurs, and wealthy eccentrics attempt to turn private fantasies into reality. Set in a fictional California town called Anzar, the novel follows these competing acts of self-creation as they collide, overlap, and occasionally explode.

Anzar, located somewhere on California’s Central Coast, is a “site of cosmic conavergence,” a magnet for runaways, tricksters, radicals, opportunists, and dreamers of every stripe. It’s the end of the nineteenth century, a half-historical, half-mythic version of the Gilded Age out west. Tramps pour in by rail and establish hobo jungles on the edges of town. Labor organizers arrive with half-baked utopian schemes to challenge the wealthy families who rule Anzar with the aid of their Loganberries, Acid Green Velvet’s stand-in for the Pinkertons. In all this tumult, Anzar, “primed by the ancients for the arrival of newcomers to tap into its potential…await[s] its true founding.”

At the novel’s center is Paulette, daughter of the confidence man Rodney Eligon. Believing she and her companion Kenneth Greycroft have successfully murdered Rodney on a northern California beach, she remakes herself as the muse and would-be wife of the wealthy eccentric Johnny Hasley, retreating with him into the increasingly strange atmosphere of Hasley Manor. Kenneth follows her south to Anzar, where labor unrest, yegg culture, occult philosophies, and class conflict are transforming the city into a temporary social experiment. The complication, of course, is that Rodney survived. Acid Green Velvet keeps changing shape. It’s a Gothic romance and a class-struggle novel, a hobo epic and a horror story, a grifter western and a fever dream about California history. Old crimes, revolutionary schemes, buried family secrets, and competing ideas about freedom all end up tangled together in Anzar.

The easiest point of comparison is probably Steinbeck. We’ve got rail yards, strikes, flophouses, and the perpetual struggle between workers and owners. But the novel’s striking prose and weird energy often reminds me more of Pynchon, particularly Against the Day: anarchists, secret histories, wandering philosophers, failed utopian projects, and people living just outside official reality. The tramps of Acid Green Velvet think of themselves as “Night People, people unimpressed by hours.”

Krilanovich depicts tramp culture as an ever-regenerative series of performances. Paulette reinvents herself. Rodney reinvents himself. Tramps invent philosophies. Yeggs invent machines and conspiracies. Labor organizers invent futures. Mystics invent cosmologies. In Acid Green Velvet, American drifter culture plays like a form of outsider art. The recurring question is not who these people are, but how long they can sustain the characters they’ve created for themselves.

The prose is remarkable. Here’s Paulette trying to describe the city that forms around the tramp occupation:

The Main Stem was a pageant, a gathering of the tribes: vagrants as sailors, vagrants as concrete men, sandwich counter girls, fieldworkers, baby handlers, food tasters, range salesmen. Vagrants as sporting girls, stoat farmers, and rat trappers. A generation from now people would pretend to know what happened here, would insist on the idea that some authoritative entity was present. Digging up the bones of our community they would pretend to comprehend the story of alien ancestors, whose skeletons lay scattered in party positions in graves dug by drunkards and sleepwalkers.

That paragraph captures an enormous amount of what Acid Green Velvet is doing. Histories emerge from rumors and communities spring from accident. The notion of a governing authority is retrospective fantasy. The people making history usually look ridiculous while they’re making it.

Yegg is one of the novel’s bywords. In Krilanovich’s hands, the term expands into something grander than its traditional meaning of burglar. The yegg is the signal class of Anzar: the tinkerer, the schemer, the amateur engineer of reality itself. Krilanovich’s yeggs build machines, rig scams, spark riots, construct impossible social theories, and generally behave like avant-garde artists set loose in a hobo jungle. Anzar is for the yeggs: people taking apart the world in hopes that something better might emerge from the pieces. Or just taking.

The labor politics are similarly strange. The conflict between tramps, workers, Loganberries, businessmen, and civic authorities is never reduced to a simple ideological struggle because almost nobody in Acid Green Velvet possesses a stable political identity to begin with. The novel is obsessed with disguises and assumed identities. On the very first pages Paulette worries that Rodney may have seen her “without my mask”; later Kenneth is described “shedding his disguise” after the attempted murder, while Johnny drifts between aristocratic elegance and “an affected laborer costume.” Ideology itself begins to feel like another role available for temporary use. People drift in and out of movements with the same improvisational energy that drives their grifts, romances, and self-created mythologies.

If the yegg is the novel’s core social class, its central moral category is sloppiness. The charge appears everywhere. Characters call each other sloppy along with variations on the theme: obvious, transparent, careless, “not smart.” A sloppy person is not necessarily unintelligent; they simply fail to manage the performance. They reveal motive, let the mask slip, tip their hand. In the shadow economy of grifters, radicals, and self-appointed prophets, that failure is a mortal sin.

Paulette, Rodney, and sundry other characters operate with cool sharpness, surviving through control, concealment, and manipulation. Kenneth Greycroft, on the other hand, does not. Kenneth is perhaps the sloppiest person in the novel, “sloppy as hell, oblivious and obvious by turns,” as Johnny Hasley describes him.

Kenneth’s sloppiness makes him the novel’s emotional center. To call him the novel’s heart would work, but the stomach is an even more appropriate organ. Everything passes through him: longing, guilt, labor politics, grief, violence, fantasy, jealousy, and desire. He absorbs and digests; he hungers, loves too visibly, grieves too visibly.

Krilanovich repeatedly frames Kenneth as someone incapable of protecting himself through self-mythology:

He’d always insisted his eyes looked forward only, though the view was occluded by a beige, ambient suffering. He was effectively blind, grappling over a forbidden landscape. Innocent.

That final word, innocent, does an enormous amount of work. Kenneth is obsessive, self-pitying, sentimental, and often catastrophically wrong. Yet his transparency increasingly comes to look like a form of innocence when set beside the machinations of Rodney, old man Hasley, and especially Little Dennis, a diminutive trickster who inserts himself into Johnny’s life like a parasite in the novel’s final third.

Kenneth’s innocence should not be confused with virtue. He plans and attempts a murder; he stalks Paulette across California. He routinely mistakes obsession for devotion. But unlike many of the novel’s other characters, he never succeeds in sealing himself off from consequence. While characters like Rodney and Little Dennis attempt to bend reality to their own purposes, Kenneth remains trapped inside the ordinary human experiences of guilt, longing, jealousy, and grief.

Rich kid Johnny represents the opposite tendency. He responds to the chaos of Anzar by closing himself off. With the aid of Little Dennis’s potions and notions, Johnny insulates himself from history, politics, and even ordinary human contact by constructing a private world governed by his own aesthetic and philosophical obsessions:

“My dream is to run amok in a realm of my own creation,” he said. … “Now, Paulette, we both know the world outside is a dangerous place beset on all sides with evil. The less flesh exposed to the elements the better.”

That impulse gradually becomes the defining tragedy of his character. While Paulette continually reshapes herself in response to circumstance, Johnny attempts to build a reality in which circumstance can no longer reach him. Hasley Manor transforms into an increasingly elaborate fantasy space ruled by mysticism, ritual, occult systems, self-help philosophies, attendants, acolytes, and eventually outright delusion.

Paulette spends the novel trying to escape definition. Johnny increasingly tries to transform reality into a private dream. Kenneth follows both through the wreckage.

Alongside them stands Shelly, perhaps the novel’s most compelling foil for Paulette. Shelly is a charismatic organizer, opportunist, idealist, and manipulator whose search for collective liberation contrasts with Paulette’s determination to preserve her own autonomy. Paulette survives by slipping away from structures of power; Shelly tries to seize those structures and remake them. Her revolutionary community offers a genuine alternative to the fathers, lovers, employers, and wealthy eccentrics who otherwise determine the terms of women’s lives, but Krilanovich also shows how quickly a movement built around liberation can develop its own rules, hierarchies, and demands. Shelly doesn’t simply represent the answer to Paulette’s isolation. She exposes the problem of finding freedom without reproducing another system of control.

Krilanovich eventually pushes this question beyond self-invention and into history itself. Beneath the tramp occupations, labor unrest, yegg philosophies, and revolutionary dreams lies a history of erased women: imprisoned wives, missing mothers, hidden rooms, buried infants, and generations of suffering concealed beneath respectable wealth. Acid Green Velvet’s final third plays as a horrific Gothic excavation, with haunted Hasley Manor serving as an archive of disappearance.

I’ve barely begun to cover everything the novel contains. I have barely touched the dream sequences, occult cosmologies, supernatural horrors, bizarre visions and apparitions, hidden chambers, prophetic trances, haunted histories, and eruptions of genuine dread. Nor have I said much about the sheer density of Krilanovich’s invention. Every time Acid Green Velvet seems poised to settle into a labor novel, a Gothic romance, a grifter story, or a historical epic, it mutates into something stranger.

The title obliquely captures the novel’s paradoxical atmosphere: Acid Green Velvet is simultaneously lush and corrosive, beautiful and decaying, comic and horrifying. Krilanovich braids genres and images until Anzar pulses like a collective hallucination sustained by tramps, mystics, radicals, confidence artists, and dreamers talking one another into existence.

The pleasures of Acid Green Velvet lie in its language, its strangeness, and its astonishing capacity for surprise. Krilanovich has created a novel as unruly, excessive, and alive as the hobo kingdom at its center — excessive, exhausting, funny, grotesque, and frequently brilliant. Very highly recommended.

Pynchon in French and Ballard’s Creation, Krilanovich’s Acid, Shaky Knees, beat by weather etc.

Any time I visit Atlanta, I have to stop by A Capella Books. I walked down there from Little Five Points, where my wife and son were still looking around. I have never seen L5P so busy, thick with hipsters young and old and even older who were killing hours, like we were, I suppose, before the first set of bands that night at the Shaky Knees festival in Piedmont Park. A Capella was pleasantly empty, for the most part.

I picked up a first American edition of J.G. Ballard’s 1987 novel The Day of Creation. Not Ballard’s finest, not his worst; the collector in me thought it should go home with me.

After some downtime at a rental we walked to Piedmont Park for the first night of Shaky Knees, an outdoor music festival featuring four stages in the sweltering swooning swanning sauna September heat. I am very much not a Music Festival Guy, but I wanted to see some of the bands in this year’s lineup, and my son wanted to see even more of the bands — so we made a family trip of it.

We arrived not quite an hour before the psyop (?) indie sensation Geese were to start their set. A band called Hot Mulligan were playing; I had tried to listen to a little bit of their music on the drive up to Atlanta (I did this for pretty much all the bands I hadn’t heard before), and it was decidedly Not For Me. I did like their live sound though, and especially the singer’s charisma. Oh who the fuck am I kidding — I guess he really just won me over when he implored the crowd to “Boo the VIP section!” (Shaky Knees, like every other thing in America right now, is a capitalist swine scam: shaded areas barricaded off for the richies to rest, covered stadium seating for the very rich richies to enjoy their punk-indie-etc., $35 margaritas, a little village of “brand partner experiences” where you could, if you were so stupidly inclined, take pictures in front of a Sierra Nevada “immersion room.” So fuckin punk!). Anyway, speaking of rich kids–

I tried to watch the band Geese with an open mind. My son likes their record and he generally has good taste. The crowd seemed to like what they were doing, which was really just a shoddy whiny blues-rock thing expressed in impoverished chords. One of the guitar players was wearing a Melt Banana t-shirt. I opened for Melt Banana at a record store in like 1999 or 2000, a piece of information that dramatically drove up my esteem in my son’s eyes. I thought Geese were genuinely bad at playing their instruments, their songs were boring, and, worst of all, their guitar tone was terrible.

Luckily Danny Elfman played next. For some reason, this legend was consigned to the smallest stage at the festival, tucked back in the hills of the park (I would see Geordie Greep there later, as well as some of the Bone Thugs-n-Harmony set). Elfman plays a lot of Oingo Boingo songs mixed in with some of the greatest hits of his scores. He plays with a full rock band, orchestra, and choir. It’s totally fucked up and amazing. If there had been a roof over the park it would’ve exploded when they played “This Is Halloween”; what’s left of the metaphorical roof would have disintegrated during The Simpsons theme. I am not, like, a Danny Elfman fan–but I guess I’m Gen X or whatever, and I suppose I really enjoy weird but very accomplished musicianship. Also, Danny Elfman is like 73 and totally jacked. (Google him.)

We caught the end of Fontaines D.C. (great show from a band I didn’t really care about) and then (speaking of rich kids), watched headliners The Strokes. I was impressed by their show — they seemed to understand the assignment and Played the Hits and Mostly That First Album.

Geordie Greep shreddin'.
Geordie Greep shreddin’.

Next day, Saturday, was generally a weaker lineup, but it featured the two acts I most wanted to see: Geordie Greep and Pavement. I’d caught Greep last week in Jacksonville, a show I didn’t know was going to happen back when I bought the Shaky tickets. Both shows were excellent. If you don’t know Greep’s stuff, it’s kinda like Zappa or King Crimson with the horny Philip-Roth-persona lyrics delivered in a crooning but theatrical style, a mix of David Lee Roth and Meat Loaf. His album The New Sound was my favorite of 2024 and pretty much everyone I’ve tried to play it for has hated it, other than my son. The day was blazing, so we scooted back to the rental, rested, and returned for Blood Orange. Their set started great but was then interrupted by lightning and thunder and then a torrential downpour and an evacuation of the park. No Pavement for your boy! I got beat by weather.

I consoled myself with recollecting the show I saw back in, what was it, ’95, ’96, with Royal Trux opening? They were fucking terrible at that show. We trudged home in inches of thick gross water. I watched the Florida-Auburn game on my laptop, another consolation. (Feed my thrill.)

We spent too much of Sunday at Piedmont Park. I think there were like 50,000 people there. It was Hot as Fuck. I was impressed by Santigold’s set, which was high energy despite the astounding, oppressive heat. My son was looking forward to Modest Mouse and was disappointed, much as I had been disappointed way back in, what was it, ’98, ’99 when I first saw them shit the bed in a boozy concert in Gainesville? (I should disclose that their front man later lived down the street from me for a season and was a notorious total dick to everyone in the scene and generally thought he was like, too cool for school I guess.) They sounded thin and unenthusiastic.

Wu-Tang Clan were unexpectedly fantastic — I mean, I love those early albums, but I honestly expected them to phone it in, but they played all the “hits” with enthusiasm and energy. LCD Soundsystem turned out to be the highlight of the festival. I’ve loved some of their tracks over the years, but soured on the band when they made an enormous fuckin’ deal about disbanding (I mean they made a film about it!) only to reunite — but they were great. I’m generally ambivalent about headliners Gorillaz, but they sounded great, played all the hits, and had an impressive roster of features show up in person, including Del the Funky Homosapien, who capped the festival with a rousing rendition of “Clint Eastwood.”

Unable to sleep, my ears ringing, I finished the novel I’d been reading on the trip,Grace Krilanovich’s Acid Green Velvet. This is a novel about hoboes, grifters, yeggs, anarchists, socialists, cults and movements and capital and anti-capital. It takes place in some alternate version of the end of the nineteenth century, in some alternate California. Acid Green Velvet is surreal and sinister and funny and sexy and gross; it’s part horror, part social satire, part historical thriller, part part part part part…Look, I loved this novel, Acid Green Velvet. Maybe fifty, sixty pages in it really sank into me, or I really sank into it. It reminds me strongly of Thomas Pynchon’s work, particularly Against the Day, with which it shares many themes and motifs, as well as Slothrop’s toilet adventures in Gravity’s Rainbow (it’s, uh, abject). It’s not just the themes, but also the oblique, layered, surrealistic/mystical style of Krilanovich’s prose that recalls Pynchon’s style. Her approach is, to be clear, in no way an imitation or approximation, but rather blood that flows from the same vein. (The phrase against the day pops up late in the novel, by the way.) Proper review to come.

And more Pynchon:

When I got back home, I had a package from Paris — Nicolas Richard’s new French translation of Pynchon’s latest novel Shadow Ticket:

Nicolas got in touch with me early last year, and we corresponded for a few months about the novel. Answering his questions and trying out some of his phrasing was some of the most fun I’ve had in years. It was like reading the novel again through different eyes, different ears. Nicolas was kind enough to include me in his acknowledgements, which is one of the biggest little thrills of my life:

Mass-market Monday | Donald Barthelme’s Snow White

Snow White, 1967, Donald Barthelme. Bantam Books (7th. printing, 1971). No cover designer credited. 181 pages.


The collector in me finally picked up this awful horny late sixties photographically-covered edition of Donald Barthelme’s classic postmodernist freak fairy tale Snow White. I think the cover is really stupid and vaguely sexist and doesn’t gel with Barthelme’s book at all, but it’s also an interesting artifact, a stupid horny sexist “sexy” cover of a piece with the sea of stupid horny sexist “sexy” mass-market covers that whirled from revolving cases in Woolworth’s and Pic-n-Save and etc. half a century ago. I love to think of some horny ne’er-do-well picking this one up, finding himself a little disappointed. Even better: A horny ne’er-do-well getting turned on to Barthelme’s postmodern trip.


The trial of Bill the dwarf:

“BILL will you begin. By telling the court in your own words how you first conceived and then supported this chimera, the illusion of your potential greatness. By means of which you have managed to assume the leadership and retain it, despite tons of evidence of total incompetence, the most recent instance being your hurlment of two six-packs of Miller High Life, in a brown-paper bag, through the windscreen of a blue Volkswagen operated by I. Fondue and H. Maeght. Two utter and absolute strangers, so far as we know.”

“Strangers to you perhaps. But not to me.”

“Well strangers is not the immediate question. Will you respond to the immediate question. How did you first conceive and then sustain —”

“The conception I have explained more or less. I wanted to make, of my life, a powerful statement etc. etc. How this wrinkle was first planted in my sensorium I know not. But I can tell you how it is sustained.”

“How.”

“I tell myself things.”

“What.”

“Bill you are the greatest. Bill you did that very nicely. Bill there is something about you. Bill you have style. Bill you are macho.”

“But despite this blizzard of self-gratulation —”

“A fear remained.”

“A fear of?”

“The black horse.”

“Who is this black horse.”

“I have not yet met it. It was described to me.”

“By?”

“Fondue and Maeght.”

“Those two who were at the controls of the Volkswagen when you hurled the brown-paper bag.”

“That is correct.”

“You cherished then for these two, Fondue and Maeght, a hate.”

“More of a miff, your worship.” “Of what standing, in the time dimension, is this miff?”

“Matter of let’s see sixteen years I would say.”

“The miff had its genesis in mentionment to you by them of the great black horse.”

“That is correct.”

“How old were you exactly. At that time.”

“Twelve years.”

“Something said to you about a horse sixteen years ago triggered, then, the hurlment.”

“That is correct.”

“Let us make sure we understand the circumstances of the hurlment. Can you disbosom yourself very briefly of the event as seen from your point of view.”

“It was about four o’clock in the afternoon.”

“What is your authority.”

“The cathouse clock.”

“Proceed.”

“I was on my way from the coin-operated laundry to the Door Store.”

“With what in view.”

“I had in mind the purchasement of a slab of massif oak, 48” by 60”, and a set of carved Byzantine legs, for the construction of a cocktail table, to support cocktails.” “Could you rubric, scout-mysteries.”

“No. It was in the nature of a threat, a punishment. I had infracted a rule.”

“What rule?”

“A rule of thumb having to do with pots. You were supposed to scour the pots with mud, to clean them. I used Ajax.”

“That was a scoutmystery, how to scour a pot with mud?”

“Indeed.”

“The infraction was then, resistance to scoutmysteries?”

“Stated in the most general terms, that would be it.”

“And what was the response of Fondue and Maeght.”

“They told me that there was a great black horse, and that it had in mind, eating me.”

“They did?”

“It would come by night, they said. I lay awake waiting.”

“Did it present itself? The horse?”

“No. But I awaited it. I await it still.”

“One more question: is it true that you allowed the fires under the vats to go out, on the night of January sixteenth, while pursuing this private vendetta?”

“It is true.”

“Vatricide. That crime of crimes. Well it doesn’t look good for you, Bill. It doesn’t look at all good for you.”

Biblioklept is twenty years old today

Biblioklept is twenty years old today.

I was 27 when I started the blog which I guess means I’m 47 now. The blog is older than both of my children (it is almost exactly nine months older than my oldest child).

More data:

I published 167 posts between 9 Sept. 2006 and 9 Sept. 2007, Biblioklept’s inaugural year. This was right around the time blogging went fully mainstream and right before social media platforms started to sink their claws into the zeitgeist. Two friends of mine had started blogs and they both independently suggested I start one, so I did. The early years of this blog are littered with posts referencing their blogs and other blogs, blogs long since defunct. One of those friends is now dead. The other friend I am no longer friends with for reasons I actually can’t even fully remember. 

Not sure of what to post for Biblioklept’s vigintennial, I spent an afternoon this weekend browsing through that first year of posts. Biblioklept was initially, ostensibly, a blog about books I had procured, pocketed, pinched, and purloined. I described outright thefts along with tomes I never returned. I also wrote about books that people “borrowed” and never gave back to me (including many, many students). I eventually took up writing, or trying to write, real “reviews” of books. Biblioklept barely had an audience the first few months, but by the end of the year the readership had grown, in large part thanks to these longer reviews, and also, I think, because of a general brattiness to the site. I was 27, like I said; I felt much older than the millennial Brooklyn hipsters all my friends lived among far North from my Florida, and I was much younger than the established literary voices that had segued from the print into the digital world. My takes on books and film and music were often uncharitable, snotty, uninformed, or just plain mean-spirited. Perhaps more cringeworthy to me are novels and films I heaped undue praise upon. I could link to lots of specific examples, but I won’t.

Scrolling through posts from 9 Sept. 2006 to 9 Sept. 2007, I was struck by a few things — how loose and chaotic the blog was, how free it seemed, how clearly aimed at an audience of maybe 10, 15 people, and how very very very angry I was all the time. A searing hatred of the Bush regime comes through in those early posts; early Biblioklept is soaked in the post-9/11 zeitgeist. Too, those early posts emanate a strange, subtle, and unacknowledged anxiety about what I might now call early millennial (or Millennial if you prefer) hipster culture. Maybe I was afraid of losing my edge to the art-school Brooklynites in little jackets with their borrowed nostalgia (I actually remembered the eighties).

As far as I can tell, I didn’t receive any review copies or advance reader copies until around November of 2007. In just a few short years it became impossible to keep up with all the books that came in. By 2010 the audience for the blog had dramatically expanded (even as blog readership on the whole declined). I was able to monetize the blog via the WordPress ads program, but I eventually abandoned that commercial practice.

I was also posting a lot more. More unasked-for data: I published 2409 posts between 9 Sept. 2013 and 9 Sept. 2014. That’s too many posts! I picked that year — call it 2014 — because I’d say that was the last little gasp of the blogosphere’s cultural relevance. Blogs still exist, sure, but they are institutional, professional, and (to employ a term that will read as very mid-twenties ten years from now), niche.

I hope that Biblioklept is still a niche blog, dedicated loosely to art and reading and books, particularly oddballish literature. But as far as the biblioklept niche: I have of course long since run out of book theft stories to tell because I haven’t stolen a book in decades.

That last sentence is a lie; I took a small tract from a house I was renting on Anacapri in June last year, an Italian translation of Alexandre Dumas’ Capri. I would like to say I took it with the intention of returning it one day. I left a deposit, one of the two physical books I took with me to Italy that summer. The theft in question, Capri, is pictured below, nestled in a new old bookcase my father-in-law told me to take.

The Dumas is posed here; its natural place in the house is in a cache of small flat tracts I store horizontally in a box in a bundle. The books it sits among are seeking shelves, or reviews, or simply my tired reading eyes. They are recent acquisitions, books to be read, and occasional redundancies. They occupy roughly one sixth of the shelf’s apparent volume; more if I double stack. I’ll try to go about filling the case slowly in this next year, 9 Sept. 2026 through 9 Sept. 2027.

I will also probably post more slowly, or more sparingly, or more sporadically (I’ll find an adverb that fits). More data (last, I promise): I published about 300 posts in the last year (9 Sept. 2025-9 Sept. 2026). I think I can deflate a bit, no? Aim for something closer to that inaugural run of just over 150 posts. Let things wind down. I’ve carved this niche and I’m comfortable in it, but I can’t go on with this thing forever. Can I?

They had given robots to the world with the lie that they would save us from labor or relieve us from drudgery so that we could grow and develop inwardly | From Walter Tevis’s Mockingbird

I had never looked at a robot that closely before, having been brought up to fear and respect them. And I became aware, looking at his stupid, manufactured face, that I was seeing for the first time what the significance of this dumb parody of humanity really was: nothing, nothing at all. Robots were something invented once out a blind love for the technology that could allow them to be invented. They had been made and given to the world of men as the weapons that nearly destroyed the world had once been given, as a “necessity.” And, deeper still, underneath that blank and empty face, identical to all the thousands of faces of its make, I could sense contempt—contempt for the ordinary life of men and women that the human technicians who had fashioned it had felt. They had given robots to the world with the lie that they would save us from labor or relieve us from drudgery so that we could grow and develop inwardly. Someone must have hated human life to have made such a thing—such an abomination in the sight of the Lord.

From Walter Tevis’s 1980 novel Mockingbird.

Mass-market Monday | J.G. Ballard’s The Drought

The Drought, 1965, J.G. Ballard. Triad Panther (1978). Cover illustration by Chris Foss (uncredited). 188 pages.


“The Draining Lake,”

being the first chapter of The Drought

aka The Burning World


At noon, when Dr. Charles Ransom moored his houseboat in the entrance to the river, he saw Quilter, the idiot-son of the old woman who lived in the ramshackle barge outside the yacht basin, standing on a spur of exposed rock on the opposite bank and smiling at the dead birds floating in the water below his feet. The reflection of his swollen head swam like a deformed nimbus among the limp plumage. The caking mudbank was speckled with pieces of paper and driftwood, and to Ransom the dreamfaced figure of Quilter resembled a demented faun strewing himself with leaves as he mourned for the lost spirit of the river.

Ransom secured the bow and stern lines to the jetty, deciding that the comparison was perhaps less than apt. Although Quilter spent as much time watching the river as Ransom or anyone else, his motives would be typically

perverse. The continued fall of the river, sustained through the spring and summer drought, gave him a kind of warped pleasure, even if he and his mother had been the first to suffer. Their derelict barge–an eccentric gift from

Quilter’s protector, Richard Foster Lomax, the architect who was Ransom’s neighbor–had now taken on a thirty-degree list, and a further fall of even a foot in the level of the water would split its hull like a desiccated pumpkin.

Shielding his eyes from the sunlight, Ransom surveyed the silent banks of the river as they wound westwards to the city of Mount Royal five miles away. He had spent the previous week alone on what was left of Lake Constant, sailing the houseboat among the draining creeks and mudflats as he waited for the evacuation of the city to end. After the closure of the hospital at Mount Royal he had intended to leave for the coast, but at the last moment decided to give himself a few final days on the lake before it vanished for good. Now and then, between the humps of damp mud, he had seen the distant span of the motorbridge across the river, the windows of thousands of cars and trucks flashing like jeweled lances as they set off along the coast road to the south.

Ransom postponed his return until all movement along the bridge had ended. By this time the lake, once a clear stretch of open water thirty miles in length, had subsided into a series of small pools and channels, separated by the banks of draining mud. A few last fishing craft sailed forlornly among them, their crews standing silently in the bows.

By contrast, something about the slow transformation exhilarated Ransom. Continue reading “Mass-market Monday | J.G. Ballard’s The Drought” →

Two from the Dorothy Project | Brais Lamela’s What Remains + Denise Rose Hansen’s Blue Sunset (Books acquired, 16 Aug. 2027)

Two new titles this October from indie powerhouse Dorothy: What Remains by Brais Lamela (in translation by Jacob Rogers) and Denise Rose Hansen’s Blue Sunset.

Here’s Dorothy’s description of What Remains:

Shifting between the present and the archival past, New York City and the remote mountains of Negueira de Muñiz, What Remains follows a young scholar’s journey into a forgotten episode of the Franco regime, uncovering both the tragic history and the still-present afterlife of a forced resettlement project in the Galician countryside of the 1950s.

Like the hybrid works of Valeria Luiselli, Nathalie Léger, and Cristina Rivera Garza, Galician writer Brais Lamela’s prize-winning debut novel blends fiction, memoir, essay, and archival research to set history in conversation with contemporary reality. The result is a work of striking intimacy that explores, with subtle prose and arresting imagery, the complexity of modern migration and the legacy of twentieth-century colonization.

Dorothy compares Hansen’s Blue Sunset to Ann Quin; I’m there:

At a conference somewhere in Europe, Maja meets the Author. Haunted by a recent tragedy, she leaves with him unexpectedly to his home on the Italian coast, where she wanders into the rhythms of his life, observing the world through the lens of his days. Yet everywhere over their new and tender intimacy hangs the knowledge that soon she will have to return home to Copenhagen, site of her devastating loss. With echoes of Virginia Woolf and Ann Quin, Denise Rose Hansen paints with spare, deft lyricism the complicated landscape of grief and yearning that Maja crosses over on her journey toward something new.

Quick riff on Gene Wolfe’s The Fifth Head of Cerberus (Book acquired, 14 Aug. 2026)

I picked up a copy of Gene Wolfe’s 1972 novel The Fifth Head of Cerberus on Friday afternoon. I’d been hoping to find a more interesting-looking edition, but the Tor Essentials hardback with an introduction by Brian Evenson fit handsomely and handily in my hands, and I haven’t had any luck hunting old Wolfes lately. After reading and then rereading his wonderful 1975 novel Peace a week or so ago, I found myself wanting more of that weird flavor. And while Cerberus isn’t as masterful or achieved as Peace, it is similarly confounding, a puzzle that baits its reader via any number of rhetorical feints, traps, false doors.

I used the term novel above to describe The Fifth Head of Cerberus. I think that is the appropriate term, although cursory research will show you that the book comprises three novellas. I had known or understood this going into reading Cerberus, but somewhere I had read that the novellas worked together (intertextually? metatextually?) to cohere into a novelly-novel. I dutifully skipped Brian Evenson’s introduction — which I promise I will read when I begin re-reading Cerberus later tonight — and dug into the title tale on Friday night.

Like Peace, I think Cerberus is best experienced as raw as possible. The great pleasure of reading Wolfe is the disorientation; his narrators will deliver stacks of details at any time that may or may not be of the profoundest importance to the “truth” or “reality” of the narrative; meanwhile, the reader is trying to adjust to the strange (but not-that-strange) world Wolfe is conjuring in his prose. Is this here and now? The past or the future? Are we in alien lanes or human spaces? I think neatly summarizing the work denies a potential reader the pleasure (and challenge) of engaging with the work. To be clear, these novels (Peace and Cerberus) do not rely on gimmicky “spoilers” for their power, but rather work as strange metadetective narratives, where the reader plays the role of investigator.

But a reader will want something more concrete, eh, a little something beyond vague gesturing. Here are some elements that The Fifth Head of Cerberus engages with all three of its pieces: colonialism, cloning, slavery, patricide, twinning, mimesis, adaptation, immortality, vision questing, dream worlds, anthropology, espionage, crime, punishment. And precursor/postcursor texts: Crime and Punishment, Flannery O’Connor, Faulkner (especially As I Lay Dying and The Sound and the Fury), Le Guin’s Hainish novels, the Vietnam War, Jules Verne, Edgar Allan Poe, J.G. Ballard, The Vorrh, À la recherche du temps perdu, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s fables, Melville’s Benito Cereno (or Pierre or The Confidence Man), Conrad, Pale Fire, Borges (really any Borges, but like especially “Pierre Menard”), any number of “the accounts of the pith helmet and puttee expeditions of the Victorians” (as one of the narrators of the third piece of Cerberus, the key text V.R.T. puts it), Kavan’s Ice, Kafka of course, mythology (all), etc., etc., etc.

But perhaps just a few broad strokes to draw a potential reader in. The first and eponymous piece, The Fifth Head of Cerberus, offers what seems to be a boyhood memoir shaped by a sinister father and a colonial world. The second piece, “A Story,” by John V. Marsch, recasts (and simultaneously complicates and simplifies) that world in a primeval dreamworld vision quest. The novel coheres (this is not the correct verb) through its final, discursive, intertextual section, V.R.T., which both reveals and confounds the previous narratives. V.R.T. offers fragments — reports, lists, transcripts, notebooks, testimony — that reverberate and loop and replay the motifs and mysteries of the previous sections. The reader’s basic questions — who is this person? — is this a person? — collapse into a more unsettling one: who gets to authorize who someone is? Thus identity is never stable, but a production, narrated, copied, inherited, imposed, revised, never quite secured. More thoughts after a second visit.

No center | Joanna Russ

There used to be an odd, popular, and erroneous idea that the sun revolved around the earth.

This has been replaced by an even odder, equally popular, and equally erroneous idea that the earth goes around the sun.

In fact, the moon and the earth revolve around a common center, and this commonly-centered pair revolves with the sun around another common center, except that you must figure in all the solar planets here, so things get complicated. Then there is the motion of the solar system with regard to a great many other objects, e.g., the galaxy, and if at this point you ask what does the motion of the earth really look like from the center of the entire universe, say…the only answer is:

that it doesn’t.

Because there isn’t.

From How to Suppress Women’s Writing by Joanna Russ, 1983.

Read an excerpt of Ishmael Reed’s forthcoming novel, The Terrible Fives

Rex Stuart (T.2s) had made a pile as the star of the soap opera Sorrows and Trials. He’d set up his film company to cater to the streaming market. Right now, Afro-Futurism is hot. He asked his agents to name a Black writer who could write a series for his company. Secretariat’s name came up. Someone said he’d read his novel Yellow Back Radio Broke Down (1969), and it ended with AI running things. Before the end of the day, Secretariat received a call from Rex Stuart. He said that he had a proposition for Secretariat. It could be a rewarding trip for him to come to Los Angeles. Secretariat picked up his ticket at United. A limousine was waiting for him at LAX. He checked in at the Beverly Hills Hotel. This would be his third stay at the hotel. He remembered that his rooms had fireplaces. Stuart met him in the restaurant. He wasn’t the matinee idol who’d thrilled millions by portraying the polo-playing playboy of Sorrows. Jowly. A paunch. Otherwise, he’d aged gracefully. Something was different about him. He had a beard. Secretariat spotted him and joined him at his table. He had a copy of Yellow Back that he wanted Secretariat to sign.

“Interesting work. I can see why the critics call you Sun Ra and George Clinton, Afro-Futurism’s fathers. Artificial intelligence is running things, leading to the elimination of 9-to-5 drudgery. You had that in your novel that was published in 1969.”

Yes, Secretariat thought, that was before my idealism went sour.

Stuart then said, “Well, it’s upon us. This Afro-Futurist stuff is trending. What do you think of it?”

Secretariat saw it as another academic scam—an excuse for professors to lure students into empty classrooms by offering something snappy to those who grew up on Star Wars. They could write long papers with the usual obscure references. Professors could attend conferences, sample good food, sightsee, and make dates.

“It’s popular, but the Afro-Futurists are missing an opportunity,” Secretariat said.

“How is that?”

“They could use the popularity of space-travel films and art to introduce Black and Brown kids to sciences like astrophysics. After a Black astrophysicist lectured, he was surrounded by Black and Brown kids. They hadn’t been taught that such a field was open to them. They were told that the football field, the basketball court, and the criminal court were the only areas open to them.”

Stuart gave Secretariat an odd look. “Something to think about. I don’t know whether you have seen—” Stuart mentioned a spate of films that carried the Afro-Futurist label. “We’d like you to try your hand at writing one for us.” Stuart mentioned an amount of money that would pay his family’s bills for a couple of years. All Secretariat had to do was write a treatment. Others would develop the story; he could withdraw his name from the production if he didn’t like the result.

Their drinks arrived, followed by a gorgeous meal. The next morning, he returned to Oakland.

Read the full excerpt from Ishmael Reed’s forthcoming novel The Terrible Fives at the Evergreen Review.

Mass-market Monday | Berton Roueché’s Eleven Blue Men

Eleven Blue Men, Berton Roueché, 1953. Berkley Medallion Books (1968). No cover artist or designer credited. 191 pages.

Simulated stag | From Gene Wolfe’s novel Peace

And so will I search now for my knife, thus getting the exercise Dr. Van Ness prescribes. It was large, and stamped with the words “Boy Scout.” The scales were of simulated black staghorn, bringing to mind (at least to mine) the image of a simulated stag, his horns held proudly as those of any elm-deer, ranging the forest among the now-waking trees, trees whose leaves are dying with the summer in every color, like bruises, but bruises beautiful as the skins of races unborn, withheld from us because God, or destiny, or the bland chance of the scientists (whose blind, piping ape-god, idiot-god, we have met before; we know you, troubler of Babylon) has denied us the sight of all these scarlet and yellow—truly red, orange, russet-brown—races on our sidewalks, and all the wonderful richness of stereotypes we might have entertained ourselves with if only they had been permitted us: the scarlet people with tight fists and loose women, gobbling dialects, a talent for paintings done with chalk upon the sides of newspaper kiosks, and high abilities in the retail merchandising of hobby supplies such as tiny-toy jet engines, and model garbage trucks whose hungry rumps, trundled about the wooden tops of retired dining-room tables in basements, will devour the dross of train-station quick-eat restaurants; the orange people with their weird religion demanding the worship of sundials (as our own seems to others that of telephone poles), so that in friendly locker-room conversations, when we have at last and at the threat of certain legal pressures admitted them to Pinelawn and are discussing the round now past, they out with strange oaths. What is a wabe?

And all of them, since all the lands of this earth are occupied, must be from strange and farther countries, from Hi Brasil and the Islands of the Sun, from the Continental Islands and the Isles of the Tethys Sea. Only the rarest, the russet browns, belong here, native to St. Brendan’s land, and they are dying; the things they are famous for are not strange oaths, or ability at any art, or cunning in a trade, but alcoholism and gonorrhea and dwindling. They make good soldiers and that is fatal, just as is the bravery of the simulated stag, which will bring him to death, answering the call of the simulated war cry to meet bullets in the dry autumn woods and fall, his lungs hemorrhaging substitute blood at the edge of the potato fields. The imitation huntsman shouts and dances for joy, and then, having learned very well to shoot, but never to butcher, and being, in his own opinion, no longer of an age to carry heavy burdens, leaves him to rot and stink, the bait of plastic flies with fishhooks in their bellies. In time his flesh, torn by such fur-like foxes as remain, and by the teeth of curs, falls away, and only his horns and his celluloid bones remain, the prey of the boys’-knife maker.

A passage from Gene Wolfe’s 1975 novel Peace.

Mass-market Monday | Gene Wolfe’s Peace

Peace, Gene Wolfe, 1975. Berkley Books  (1982). No cover artist or designer credited. 246 pages.

The uncredited cover artist is obviously and well-documentedly Gahan Wilson.

Maybe a hundred pages into Gene Wolfe’s 1975 novel Peace it struck me that this book is, like, an American post-modernist classic that we would now talk about alongside novels of writers like Pynchon, Barth, Reed, Coover, Barthelme, etc., if the Publishing Industry and Academia didn’t have hangups about sci-fi and fantasy. And the novel is only sci-fi or fantasy in the sense that, like, Gravity’s Rainbow is sci-fi fantasy or Pricksongs & Descants is sci-fi fantasy or Chimera is sci-fi fantasy. Anyway.

I “finished” Peace like an hour ago and I am going to reread it this week. The final chapter made some baffling moves; I realized that I missed a lot (not unlike my reading experience with Wolfe’s baroque postmodern fantasy epic The Book of the New Sun). Wolfe has a big bag of tricks in Peace; this is a haunted house, haunted by Sheherazade and her matryoshka dolls. The novel is larded with stories that loop and decay and engender new stories, moments of strange beauty and death and life; consider the narrator Den Weer, on the second page, describing roses who, “like mothers holding up their dead infants” show “the softly rotten shoots they put forth in the last warm weather of fall.” This is a novel about extinction.

I hope I manage more thoughts after a reread. For now, an incomplete list of books that I connected to Peace, as vibe or I do not know what:

Carpenter’s Gothic, William Gaddis

Benito Cereno, Herman Melville

Dhalgren, Samuel R. Delany

Gravity’s Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

The House of Seven Gables, Nathaniel Hawthorne

Wide Sargasso Sea, Jean Rhys

As I Lay Dying, William Faulkner

A Canticle for Leibowitz, Walter M. Miller Jr.

Chimera, John Barth

It happened that the ship, gaining her port, was moored to the dock on a Fourth of July | From Herman Melville’s Israel Potter

It happened that the ship, gaining her port, was moored to the dock on a Fourth of July; and half an hour after landing, hustled by the riotous crowd near Faneuil Hall, the old man narrowly escaped being run over by a patriotic triumphal car in the procession, flying a broidered banner, inscribed with gilt letters:

“BUNKER-HILL
1775.
GLORY TO THE HEROES THAT FOUGHT!”

It was on Copps’ Hill, within the city bounds, one of the enemy’s positions during the fight, that our wanderer found his best repose that day. Sitting down here on a mound in the graveyard, he looked off across Charles River towards the battle-ground, whose incipient monument, at that period, was hard to see, as a struggling sprig of corn in a chilly spring. Upon those heights, fifty years before, his now feeble hands had wielded both ends of the musket. There too he had received that slit upon the chest, which afterwards, in the affair with the Serapis, being traversed by a cutlass wound, made him now the bescarred bearer of a cross.

For a long time he sat mute, gazing blankly about him. The sultry July day was waning. His son sought to cheer him a little ere rising to return to the lodging for the present assigned them by the ship-captain. “Nay,” replied the old man, “I shall get no fitter rest than here by the mounds.”

But from this true “Potter’s Field,” the boy at length drew him away; and encouraged next morning by a voluntary purse made up among the reassembled passengers, father and son started by stage for the country of the Housatonie. But the exile’s presence in these old mountain townships proved less a return than a resurrection. At first, none knew him, nor could recall having heard of him. Ere long it was found, that more than thirty years previous, the last known survivor of his family in that region, a bachelor, following the example of three-fourths of his neighbors, had sold out and removed to a distant country in the west; where exactly, none could say.

He sought to get a glimpse of his father’s homestead. But it had been burnt down long ago. Accompanied by his son, dim-eyed and dim-hearted, he next went to find the site. But the roads had years before been changed. The old road was now browsed over by sheep; the new one ran straight through what had formerly been orchards. But new orchards, planted from other suckers, and in time grafted, throve on sunny slopes near by, where blackberries had once been picked by the bushel. At length he came to a field waving with buckwheat. It seemed one of those fields which himself had often reaped. But it turned out, upon inquiry, that but three summers since a walnut grove had stood there. Then he vaguely remembered that his father had sometimes talked of planting such a grove, to defend the neighboring fields against the cold north wind; yet where precisely that grove was to have been, his shattered mind could not recall. But it seemed not unlikely that during his long exile, the walnut grove had been planted and harvested, as well as the annual crops preceding and succeeding it, on the very same soil.

Ere long, on the mountain side, he passed into an ancient natural wood, which seemed some way familiar, and midway in it, paused to contemplate a strange, mouldy pile, resting at one end against a sturdy beech. Though wherever touched by his staff, however lightly, this pile would crumble, yet here and there, even in powder, it preserved the exact look, each irregularly defined line, of what it had originally been—namely, a half-cord of stout hemlock (one of the woods least affected by exposure to the air), in a foregoing generation chopped and stacked up on the spot, against sledging-time, but, as sometimes happens in such cases, by subsequent oversight, abandoned to oblivious decay—type now, as it stood there, of forever arrested intentions, and a long life still rotting in early mishap.

“Do I dream?” mused the bewildered old man, “or what is this vision that comes to me of a cold, cloudy morning, long, long ago, and I heaving yon elbowed log against the beech, then a sapling? Nay, nay, I cannot be so old.”

“Come away, father, from this dismal, damp wood,” said his son, and led him forth.

Blindly ranging to and fro, they next saw a man ploughing. Advancing slowly, the wanderer met him by a little heap of ruinous burnt masonry, like a tumbled chimney, what seemed the jams of the fire- place, now aridly stuck over here and there, with thin, clinging, round, prohibitory mosses, like executors’ wafers. Just as the oxen were bid stand, the stranger’s plough was hitched over sideways, by sudden contact with some sunken stone at the ruin’s base.

“There, this is the twentieth year my plough has struck this old hearthstone. Ah, old man,—sultry day, this.”

“Whose house stood here, friend?” said the wanderer, touching the half-buried hearth with his staff, where a fresh furrow overlapped it.

“Don’t know; forget the name; gone West, though, I believe. You know ’em?”

But the wanderer made no response; his eye was now fixed on a curious natural bend or wave in one of the bemossed stone jambs.

“What are you looking at so, father?”

“‘Father!’ Here,” raking with his staff, “my father would sit, and here, my mother, and here I, little infant, would totter between, even as now, once again, on the very same spot, but in the unroofed air, I do. The ends meet. Plough away, friend.”

Best followed now is this life, by hurrying, like itself, to a close.

Few things remain.

He was repulsed in efforts after a pension by certain caprices of law. His scars proved his only medals. He dictated a little book, the record of his fortunes. But long ago it faded out of print—himself out of being—his name out of memory. He died the same day that the oldest oak on his native hills was blown down.

From Herman Melville’s novel Israel Potter: His Fifty Years of Exile

“…the amazing, world-reversing night of Fourth of July Eve 1899″ (Pynchon’s Against the Day)

For years after, there were tales told in Colorado of the amazing, world-reversing night of Fourth of July Eve 1899. Next day’d be full of rodeos, marching bands, and dynamite explosions—but that night there was man-made lightning, horses gone crazy for miles out into the prairie, electricity flooding up through the iron of their shoes, shoes that when they finally came off and got saved to use for cowboy quoits, including important picnic tourneys from Fruita to Cheyenne Wells, why they would fly directly and stick on to the spike in the ground, or to anything else nearby made of iron or steel, that’s when they weren’t collecting souvenirs on their way through the air—gunmen’s guns came right up out of their holsters and buck knives out from under pants legs, keys to traveling ladies’ hotel rooms and office safes, miners’ tags, fencenails, hairpins, all seeking the magnetic memory of that long-ago visit. Veterans of the Rebellion fixing to march in parades were unable to get to sleep, metallic elements had so got to humming through their bloodmaps. Children who drank the milk from the dairy cows who grazed nearby were found leaning against telegraph poles listening to the traffic speeding by through the wires above their heads, or going off to work in stockbrokers’ offices where, unsymmetrically intimate with the daily flow of prices, they were able to amass fortunes before anyone noticed. .

A passage from Thomas Pynchon’s novel Against the Day.

Mass-market Monday | Eye of the Heart: Short Stories from Latin America

Eye of the Heart: Short Stories from Latin America, ed. by Barbara Howes, 1973. Avon-Bard (1974). No cover artist or designer credited. 576 pages.

A promising mixtape, via many translators. Clarice Lispector might not have been a big enough name for English-reading audiences in the 1970s to make the front or back cover, but editor Barbara Howes included two of her stories.

Here is a piece (the shortest) from the collection:


“Why Reeds Are Hollow”

by

Gabriela Mistral

Translated by William Jay Smith


For don Max. Salas Marchant

I

Even in the peaceful world of plants, a social revolution once took place. It is told that in this case the leaders were those vain reeds. A master of rebellion, the wind, disseminated propaganda, and in no time at all there was talk of nothing else in the vegetal centers. Virgin forests fraternized with silly gardens, in a common struggle for equality.

Equality of what? Of their thickness of trunk, the excellence of their fruit, their right to pure water?

No, simply equality of height. The ideal was that all should raise their heads uniformly. The corn had no thought of making itself strong like the oak, but only of stirring its hairy tassels at the same elevation. The rose did not strive to be useful like the rubber plant, but just wanted to reach that high crown, and make of it a pillow on which to lull its flowers to sleep.

Vanity, vanity! Delusions of grandeur, even if they went against Nature, caricatured their aims. In vain, some modest flowers—the shy violet and flat-nosed lily—spoke of divine law and the evils of pride. Their voices seemed dotty.

An old poet, bearded like the River God, condemned the project in the name of beauty, and had some wise things to say about uniformity, hateful to him in every respect.

II

How did it all turn out? People tell of strange influences at work. Earth spirits blew upon the plants with their monstrous vitality, and so it was that an ugly miracle took place.

One night, the world of lawn and shrub grew dozens of feet, as if obeying some imperious appeal from the stars.

Next day, the country people were dismayed—when they came out of their huts—to find clover high as a cathedral and wheat fields wild with gold!

It was maddening. Animals roared with fright, lost in the darkness of their pastures. Birds chirped in desperation, their nests having risen to unheard-of heights. Nor could they fly down in search of seed: gone was the sunbathed soil, the grass’s humble tapestry.

Shepherds lingered by their flocks beside dark pastures; their sheep refused to enter anything so dense, afraid they might be swallowed up completely.

Meanwhile, victorious, the reeds laughed aloud, whipping their riotous leaves against the blue tops of the eucalyptus.

III

Thus a month is said to have passed. Then the decline set in.

And it came about in this fashion: violets, which delight in shade, dried up when their purple heads were exposed to full sunlight.

“It doesn’t matter,” the reeds hastened to say. “They’re a mere nothing.”

(But in the country of the spirits, they were mourned.)

Lilies, stretching their height to fifty feet, broke in two. Like the heads of queens, white marble heads lay lopped off all around.

The reeds argued as before. (But the Graces ran wild through the wood, lamenting.)

Lemon trees at that height lost all their blossoms to the violent winds. Adios, harvest!

“It doesn’t matter,” the reeds stated yet again. “Their fruit was so bitter.”

The clover dried out, its stems twisting like threads in a fire.

Corn tassels drooped, but no longer from gentle lassitude. In all their extravagant length they fell upon the earth, heavy as rails.

Potatoes, to strengthen their stems, put forth feeble tubers; these were little bigger than apple seeds.

Now the reeds laughed no more; at last they grew serious.

Blossoms of shrub or grass were no longer being fertilized: the insects could not reach them without overheating their little wings.

Furthermore, it was said that man had neither bread nor fruit nor forage for his animals; hunger and sorrow were abroad in the land.

In such a state of things, only the tall trees remained sound, trunks rising strongly as ever: they had not yielded to temptation.

The reeds were the last to fall, signaling the total disaster of their tree-level theory; roots rotted from excessive humidity, and even the network of foliage could not keep them from drying out.

It was then clear that, compared with their former solid bulk, they’d become hollow. They reached hungry leagues upward, but, their insides being empty, they were laughable, like marionettes or dolls.

In the face of such evidence, no one could defend their philosophy; no more was said about it for thousands of years.

Nature—generous always—repaired the damage in six months, seeing to it that all wild plants would again spring up in the usual way.

The poet, bearded like the River God, appeared after a long absence and, rejoicing, sang of the new era.

“So be it, dear people. Beautiful is the violet for its minuteness, and the lemon tree for its gentle shape. Beautiful are all things as God made them: the noble oak and the brittle barley.”

The earth bore fruit once again; flocks fattened, the people were nourished.

But the reeds—those rebel chieftains—bore for all time the mark of their disgrace: they were hollow, hollow . . .

 

Conversations with Don DeLillo and Other Conversations by Drew Lerman (Book acquired, 3 June 2026)

I’m a big fan of Drew Lerman’s work, and I’m always excited when he puts together a new collection. His latest is Conversations with Don DeLillo and Other Conversations, collecting his recent strips. I would describe these strips as functioning in the mode of pseudoautiobiographical postmodern literary interrogation, only that makes them sound pretentious, which they aren’t. They are very funny and very niche, and I often feel like I am Lerman’s ideal reader. This is my niche.

Each one-page strip features (a version of) Lerman encountering (and often trailing) a writer (DeLillo, obv., but also Joy Williams, Jonathan Franzen, Gordon Lish, William T. Vollmann…); the conversations are often very one-sided and allow Lerman to interrogate his subject on the kind of minutiae that often overtakes our ability to see the forest for the trees, so to speak, when it comes to art. In one of my favorite bits, for example, Lerman critiques the implementation of (“middle school book report-ass”) Courier New Unjustified as the font for DeLillo’s novel The Silence. I could go on but I should save it for a proper review.

Conversations with Don DeLillo also features a great negative blurb by a certain grouchy “Myron Circle”:

And maybe this is corny of me, but I love that Lerman used Chris Ware stamps to mail me Conversations with Don DeLillo. (Chris Ware shows up in Conversations, btw — he tries to give Lerman a bunch of his books and tell Lerman how much he loves Snake Creek

More thoughts to come.