Gods, monsters, and cosmic weirdos battle for ultimate supremacy in Jesse Moynihan’s stellar graphic novel Forming

In Jesse Moynihan’s Forming, horny, neurotic, power-mad weirdos battle for supremacy, and in the process generate (and degenerate) the universe. Moynihan’s mutants can alter reality by force of will (and force of force) but they can barely manage their own appetites and grudges. It’s great fucking stuff.

Forming throws biblical genealogy, Greek succession myths, and Zoroastrian cosmology into a whirlpool of family disasters. We’ve got angels, aliens, and assassins. We’ve got giants, pissed-off proles, sudden whales and psychedelic geometric entities. We’ve got a cypher, a grinning black crescent in hot-pink boots named Nobody. Forming treats mythology as one enormous pulsing contradictory history, breaking familiar stories apart and rebuilding them as episodes in an ongoing struggle for power. The cosmic and the ridiculous are inseparable, and nobody, however exalted, is above the fray.

Moynihan’s epic begins in modest earnest ironic cartooning. Forming’s earliest pieces are one-pagers, little machines: setup, escalation, punchline. Consider this gag, in which Noah’s attempt at friendly solidarity swerves into class grievances and violent threats:

Elsewhere, Lucifer gets goosed by a ghost:

The jokes are more than tone-setting japes; they lead to worldbuilding. Atlantis emerges from labor dispute. Archangel Michael and Lucifer battle and banter in the metaphysical background. Insults, misunderstandings, and casual brutality establish cosmic hierarchies. Moynihan builds his epic sideways: setups produce universes; punchlines produce consequences.

William Blake is a clear progenitor for Forming (both visually and schematically) — particularly the Blake of The Book of Urizen and The Four Zoas, where creation begins with division and cosmic history is a rough family album chronicling the gods’ goddamned damaged relations. Throughout Blake’s mythology, the elevation of a partial perspective into absolute truth produces division and conflict.

Moynihan pricks this predicament with a spur of emphatically comic physical life. His gods and demiurges can alter reality through force of will, yet remain tangled up in their rivalries, passions, and shortsighted ambitions. Janus asks a squad of assassins: “Is the power of your belief strong enough to change this reality?” — a Blakean speculation, a nod to imaginative power — but in Forming the answer to that question might play out with somegod getting their ass whooped. Metaphysics and slapstick run on the same aesthetic engine.

One of Forming’s central concerns is the uneasy relationship between (the pretense of) divine authority and the poet/artist who attempts to describe it. This conflict has another literary progenitor in John Milton and his epic Paradise Lost — the fall, the rebellion, divine providence, all that celestial jazz. Moynihan inserts Milton into a brief episode, late in Forming, where the blind poet wrestles with the influence of his own great precursor, Homer. Moynihan’s Milton appeals to God. He needs help in forming his depiction of Michael’s battle with Satan into “something truly badass.” What muse answers?

Milton thinks he’s writing the war in Heaven. The war in Heaven is apparently writing Milton. In Forming, the inspiriting Muse might be an assassin or secret agent, Origins Unknown. Is the poet’s aesthetic vision prompted by the metaphysical, psychological, biological? Does the poet invent his material, receive it, or get recruited into somebody else’s shenanigans?

Blake, of course, had his own complicated relationship with Milton. In Milton: A Poem, the precursor poet’s influence challenges Blake to confront and transform  Milton’s theological and moral framework in favor of his own intuition and imagination. The anxiety of influence becomes a spiritual struggle: literary inheritance is something the younger poet must wrestle with rather than merely receive. Moynihan makes a comic variation on that struggle by putting Milton inside the very mythology he hopes to describe. The poet becomes another participant in the cosmic disorder, the poem its strange, self-creating artifact.

If Blake and Milton inform Forming’s theological and literary complications, Jack Kirby supplies much of the cosmic hardware. Kirby’s Fourth World comics, especially The New Gods, along with his later Marvel series The Eternals, chronicled divine genealogies and technological spectacle in a unique, Kirbyesque (forgive the tautology) visual language that other cartoonists continue to aspire to. Kirby’s gods wield weapons that look like they were designed in a mad god’s laboratory.

Forming draws on that Kirbyesque grandiosity but gives it a distinctly unruly cast. Its gods are similarly conceived as cosmic beings whose bodies, tools, and environments blur the line between divinity and machinery. Michael, Metatron, and Enoch manifest as components of a vast theological apparatus. Cosmic entities employ cool tech. But where Kirby’s monumental designs often project a sense of cosmic authority and immense structural order, Moynihan’s visual scale gestures towards slippery, fecund violent comedy and transcendent disorder. These gods are engineers, colonizers, bureaucrats, sneak thieves and warriors, dysfunctional relatives operating machinery far more sophisticated than they are. It’s all very sloppy, abject, gross. (That’s some of the highest praise I can heap.) And where Kirby’s legendary splash pages rumble like tectonic plates colliding, every punch and energy blast carrying the weight of a cosmic principle, Moynihan’s setpieces retain a playground-fight intensity that resonates with rude emotion. His combatants sound like children inventing special attacks in a backyard brawl. Celestial warfare gives us crystalline weapons and billions of years of history, the “Unblockable Strike” and “NO WAY BOZO!!” Who would not like to be there? To participate, even?

The fights are fucking awesome. Beams, blades, transformations, colossal bodies, and reality-altering attacks give physical form to the comic’s competing creation myths. There’s plenty of cool shit. Moynihan might spend pages on divine entities bickering or goofing around and then deliver a splash page of some impossible brute absolutely whaling on another impossible brute.

Forming’s grandiosity is inseparable from its ridiculousness. An ancient cosmic grievance might end with somebody getting the shit kicked out of them. Sooner or later, though, somebody has to ask whether all this spectacular violence means something or if it’s just like, fucking awesome to look at. Natch, that somebody is Nobody.

Nobody pops up with his sexy pink boots in Forming’s third act to offer metatextual commentary on how stories are made, marketed, and judged. He complains about every “rando dipstick” wanting to make “deep” art, scorns metaphor, and defends entertainment as a product designed to satisfy the broadest possible consumer base. Nommo, whose artistic vision has remade (literally reformed) the planet around them, responds by invoking the hoary old ideal of truth as the “true entertainment” worthy of the soul, higher than the gross marketplace. It’s an ideal that brings a third Dead English Poet to mind, our old dear John Keats, dead at 25, who nevertheless managed immortality with the zinger: “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all / Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.” I’ve never known quite what to make of those lines. Keats, or Keats’s speaker, puts this pronouncement about beauty and truth in the urn’s mouth, which, like, an urn doesn’t fucking have, a mouth, then leaves us wondering who gets to speak for art and whether an artwork can settle its own meaning. That radical aesthetic uncertainty tingles throughout Forming (where an urn certainly could have a mouth, I suppose), staging a loose debate about art and entertainment inside a comic full of dirty jokes and spectacular fights.

Neither position wins — the tension remains. Art might be slipped on like a fancy robe, a disguise for vanity, elitism, and self-coronation. Entertainment can become a product engineered to offend nobody while selling (out) everything. “Content” is both an economically accurate term and a little linguistic coffin into which the distinctions among art, entertainment, criticism, and advertising are tossed (but left unburied).

Moynihan gives himself plenty of room on both sides of the argument. Forming is full of metaphor, philosophy, theological speculation, colossal ambition, and authorial indulgence. It is also full of goofy monsters and obscene punchlines. It wants William Blake and “FUCK YOU GHOST!” It wants Miltonic prophecy and the awesome-shit spectacle of the Unblockable Strike. Its vulgarity is part and parcel of its take on creation, authority, and the desire to make something — art, entertainment, a really cool fucking comic — that other people will take seriously.

Here, Moynihan has something in common with Johnny Ryan and Benjamin Marra, cartoonists whose rough, vulgar surfaces refuse the tasteful separation of trash from art. Ryan’s comics run on unchecked appetite and endless bodily mutation; Marra pushes macho heroics past competence and into ritual. Moynihan is less relentlessly abrasive than Ryan and less committed to Marra’s deadpan masculine theater, but all three understand the expressive possibilities of crudity. An ugly body can puncture heroic pretensions, and an obscene joke can expose the absurdities hidden inside an exalted idea.

In Forming, that crudity brings the sacred insistently back to the body. Moynihan’s gods boast, reproduce, misunderstand instructions, hunger, shit, threaten strangers, and become trapped in forms they cannot control. For all their power, they remain subject to the vanity and confusion animating the comic’s smallest disputes. Even the most exalted being can wind up looking like an idiot. Or really fucking cool. Or really fucking cool and idiotic at the same time.

The comic’s shifting visual forms accommodate these sudden collapses of scale and dignity. Its pages move between compressed gag-strip grids and visionary spectacle, from cramped exchanges of insults to enormous abysses and burning colossi. Moynihan employs a nine-panel grid on most pages, establishing a rhythm of setup and punchline; his dramatic splash pages break out of that rhythm. Underground-comic crudity, psychedelic Hanna-Barbera, and Fletcher Hanks’s grotesque distortions haunt the visual mix, but by the book’s end Moynihan has pushed that unruliness toward something luminous and hallucinatory: the cosmic geometries of Kilian Eng, the psychedelic expansiveness of Moebius, even a Goethean drama of color and perception. The changes in scale become changes in visual logic, as the gag-strip machinery opens onto vast, unstable fields of color, form, and energy.

It all adds up to something genuinely and unexpectedly moving. Moynihan began Forming as a webcomic in 2009 and worked on it, intermittently and with increasing formal ambition, for seventeen years. Over that time, one gag opened onto another creation myth, one family grievance sparked another cosmic war, and each new generation inherited the wreckage of the last. The accumulation of jokes, betrayals, mutations, and apocalyptic battles gradually became an immense, deeply peculiar vision of creation, sustained by Moynihan’s willingness to keep expanding it without ever taming its absurdity.

Fantagraphics’ new complete edition gives that long undertaking an appropriately beautiful physical form. At 448 full-color pages, the hardcover is substantial without becoming unwieldy, handsomely printed and remarkably easy to read despite the density of Moynihan’s cosmology. The crisp reproduction and generous page size let the colors blaze, the crowded grids breathe, and the sudden splashes achieve their full scale. In this latest, perhaps final form, Forming is a masterful achievement.

Yet the book’s arrival at a finished form does not mean that its contradictions settle into place. There is something tender in the persistence with which Moynihan carries these oppositions and eruptions through cosmic violence, deranged theology, and dubious ambition. Forming ultimately suggests that these tensions might be carried forward only by passing into another form. The sacred and the stupid occupy the same panel, sometimes the same body. Creation is an ongoing accident, forever producing creatures who misunderstand the world, alter it, and occasionally reach for one another as everything comes apart in a ridiculous and tender gesture.

Beautiful, bewildering, hilarious, and unexpectedly affecting, Forming is very highly recommended.

Sunday Comix

“Horror Story” by Eddie Campbell. Published in Taboo Especial, Spiderbaby Grafix & Publications, 1991.

Sunday Comix

A panel from Pim & Francie: The Golden Bear Days by Al Columbia, Fantagraphics Books, 2009.

Sunday Comix

A few panels from “What an Interesting City!” by Julie Doucet. Published in Dirty Plotte #5, May 1992, Drawn & Quarterly.

 

Sunday Comix

A panel from “Pray for Pianoland” by Brian Blomerth. Published in NOW #4, Sept. 2018, Fantagraphics Books.

Sunday Comix

“I Don’t Get It” by Robert Crumb, published in Mystic Funnies #1, Alex Wood, 1997.

Sunday Comix

From Mi pequeño (Mon fiston) by Olivier Schrauwen, Norma Editorial, 2009.

Conversations with Don DeLillo and Other Conversations by Drew Lerman (Book acquired, 3 June 2026)

I’m a big fan of Drew Lerman’s work, and I’m always excited when he puts together a new collection. His latest is Conversations with Don DeLillo and Other Conversations, collecting his recent strips. I would describe these strips as functioning in the mode of pseudoautiobiographical postmodern literary interrogation, only that makes them sound pretentious, which they aren’t. They are very funny and very niche, and I often feel like I am Lerman’s ideal reader. This is my niche.

Each one-page strip features (a version of) Lerman encountering (and often trailing) a writer (DeLillo, obv., but also Joy Williams, Jonathan Franzen, Gordon Lish, William T. Vollmann…); the conversations are often very one-sided and allow Lerman to interrogate his subject on the kind of minutiae that often overtakes our ability to see the forest for the trees, so to speak, when it comes to art. In one of my favorite bits, for example, Lerman critiques the implementation of (“middle school book report-ass”) Courier New Unjustified as the font for DeLillo’s novel The Silence. I could go on but I should save it for a proper review.

Conversations with Don DeLillo also features a great negative blurb by a certain grouchy “Myron Circle”:

And maybe this is corny of me, but I love that Lerman used Chris Ware stamps to mail me Conversations with Don DeLillo. (Chris Ware shows up in Conversations, btw — he tries to give Lerman a bunch of his books and tell Lerman how much he loves Snake Creek

More thoughts to come.

Flower in a Stream — David Berman

Flower in a Stream, c. 1989 by David Cloud Berman (1967-2019). Originally published in Caliban #8, 1990.

Sunday Comix

A page from Laid Waste by Julia Gfrörer, Fantagraphics Books, 2016.

Sunday Comix

Cover for Good Girls #3 by Carol Lay, Fantagraphics Books, 1988.

Sunday Comix

A page by Charles Burns from BLAB! no. 2, Summer 1987, Monte Comix Productions.

Sunday Comix

A panel from The Adventures of Jodelle by Guy Peellaert (art) and Pierre Bartier (script), Le Terrain Vague, 1966. English translation by Richard Seaver, Grove Press, 1967. Reprinted by Fantagraphics, 2013.

Sunday Comix

From “Outstanding Young Men of America” by Paul Mavrides. Published in Zap Comix #16, Feb. 2016, Fantagraphics.

Sunday Comix

A page from Man from Utopia by Rick Griffin, San Francisco Comic Book Company, 1972.

Sunday Comix

From “Catholic School” by Penny Moran. Published in Wimmen’s Comix #15, 1989, Rip Off Press. Reprinted in The Complete Wimmen’s Comix, Vol. 2, Fantagraphic Books.

Sunday Comix

Melinda Gebbie’s cover for Wimmen’s Comix #7, December 1976, Last Gasp. Reprinted in The Complete Wimmen’s Comix, Vol. 1, Fantagraphic Books.