Blog about some recent reading

 

I reread Jesse Moynihan’s epic psychedelic graphic novel Forming from in full last night, staying up too late in doing so.

I’d read it in parcels and chunks over the nearly two decades Moynihan worked on it; I also read it in consistent chunky episodes over the past few months, when the nice people (nice person, you know who you are man) sent me a copy of its completed Forming form. But I hadn’t read it from soup to nuts, aye aye to zee, you get me, yeah, until last night.

I will do a proper review of Forming I swear I swear I swear, but reading it through I was genuinely moved, not just by the sheer accomplishment of the thing, the way Moynihan brings his teeming Blakean pantheon of gods and demiurges to heel (or whatever appendage) across an epic of cosmic creation and destruction, but by the weird, tender persistence of the whole enterprise. A comprehensive summary is not necessary (by which I mean too hard for me to muster right now) but–

Forming is William Blake’s prophetic books macrodosed on that good shit, raised on psychedelic Hanna-Barbera cartoons and Fletcher Hanks comics, gods and monsters and angels and demons doing metaphysical slapstick; grotesque, hilarious, strangely beautifully strange.

I’m halfway through The Disappearers by Marlon James. This book got a New York Times review so glowing that it melted half of what’s left of altlittwitter into an incandescent mean girl pose for about five minutes. (I think the vibe has moved on.) That’s my way of saying that no one needs my own take on this.

I’m not gonna lie, the second section of The Disappearers, “The Blackjacks,” was so ugly that I had to take a short lil break and, like, read something else. That was the intention, of course. The novel is painfully real and hurts with a clarity absent from James’s recent Black Leopard novels, which, if I’m honest, I enjoy more. (I have connected very much to James’s evocation of late-eighties-transitioning-to-nineties nostalgia: the music, the grunge, the fear, the Chris Claremont’s Uncanny X-Men of it all.)

Back to the stack, natch: I already reviewed Grace Krilanovich’s Acid Green Velvet, a fantastic novel where

nearly everyone is trying to invent a new self. Tramps become philosophers, grifters become visionaries, labor organizers become prophets, mystics become entrepreneurs, and wealthy eccentrics attempt to turn private fantasies into reality. Set in a fictional California town called Anzar, the novel follows these competing acts of self-creation as they collide, overlap, and occasionally explode.

Loved it loved it loved it, gotta shelve it now.

Goodbye to Goodbye is a new collection of Stephen Dixon’s “greatest hits” (McSweeney’s, the publisher, has not characterized the volume that way). I have a rough draft of a review forthcoming, but basically, if you have any interest in Stephen Dixon, this ain’t a bad place to start. (I will expound upon why you might want to start into Dixon in that review; for now, check out “Frog in Prague,” in which our autofictional hero tries to get to Kafka’s grave.)

Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up to Me by Richard Fariña — I finally read it. I read it because of Thomas Pynchon, who may or may not be the basis of a character in the novel, but who definitely wrote an introduction for it, in my edition and I’m guessing every edition after the first, and who definitely was not Fariña’s best friend or roommate, as the internet somewhat persists in reporting. A drug novel, a would-be travel novel, but really just (just?) a campus novel, Been Down is the kind of jam I would’ve thought profound when I was 20, 21; mostly I found its hero Gnossos Pappadopoulis to be a boor and an asshole — although I think that was also maybe kinda the point. It was often very funny. But not great!

I read Stanley Crawford’s 1978 “novel” Some Instructions to My Wife: Concerning the Upkeep of the House and Marriage, and to My Son and Daughter Concerning the Conduct of Their Childhood over two afternoons. I think Crawford is the best novelist no one has read (not you, dear reader, I know you’re hip to Crawford, Ole Ess Cee) — just a mean satirical hooting raspberry directed at middle-class American values. Makes a nice surreal trilogy with Crawford’s other slim novels The Log of the S.S. The Mrs Unguentine (1972) and Petroleum Man (2005).

Diane Williams’ latest is I Liked Rex. I had been reading one of Williams’ weird microslices a day for a while, until my attention shifted elsewhere, through no fault of Williams or Rex. Here is

“In the Bright Valley”

by

Diane Williams

He is a young man getting in a little extra sleep before the evening, which helps him to feel gen-erous warmth toward others—and to feel opti-mistic.

He had been down on his back on the narrow bench, with his arms hanging down to the floor, and he had taken a nap in the locker room, where he also eats his lunch.

On the job he doesn’t deal with the butter, which builds into a mountain in a glassed-in room, where claws dip down into it.

He minds the milk, and if he is not quick enough, it spouts and spills, because the packs of milk may fall out of their baskets and break open while they rush toward him.

He does have a panic button to push that brings in a lot of help—the people with mops and buckets—but his shoes and overalls did get wet this morning.

A deluge can create a deeply affecting mood— which this young man undergoes solely as glit-tering.

 

 

Yeggs, grifters, and revolutionaries scheme and dream in Grace Krilanovich’s excellent new novel Acid Green Velvet

In Grace Krilanovich’s Acid Green Velvet, nearly everyone is trying to invent a new self. Tramps become philosophers, grifters become visionaries, labor organizers become prophets, mystics become entrepreneurs, and wealthy eccentrics attempt to turn private fantasies into reality. Set in a fictional California town called Anzar, the novel follows these competing acts of self-creation as they collide, overlap, and occasionally explode.

Anzar, located somewhere on California’s Central Coast, is a “site of cosmic conavergence,” a magnet for runaways, tricksters, radicals, opportunists, and dreamers of every stripe. It’s the end of the nineteenth century, a half-historical, half-mythic version of the Gilded Age out west. Tramps pour in by rail and establish hobo jungles on the edges of town. Labor organizers arrive with half-baked utopian schemes to challenge the wealthy families who rule Anzar with the aid of their Loganberries, Acid Green Velvet’s stand-in for the Pinkertons. In all this tumult, Anzar, “primed by the ancients for the arrival of newcomers to tap into its potential…await[s] its true founding.”

At the novel’s center is Paulette, daughter of the confidence man Rodney Eligon. Believing she and her companion Kenneth Greycroft have successfully murdered Rodney on a northern California beach, she remakes herself as the muse and would-be wife of the wealthy eccentric Johnny Hasley, retreating with him into the increasingly strange atmosphere of Hasley Manor. Kenneth follows her south to Anzar, where labor unrest, yegg culture, occult philosophies, and class conflict are transforming the city into a temporary social experiment. The complication, of course, is that Rodney survived. Acid Green Velvet keeps changing shape. It’s a Gothic romance and a class-struggle novel, a hobo epic and a horror story, a grifter western and a fever dream about California history. Old crimes, revolutionary schemes, buried family secrets, and competing ideas about freedom all end up tangled together in Anzar.

The easiest point of comparison is probably Steinbeck. We’ve got rail yards, strikes, flophouses, and the perpetual struggle between workers and owners. But the novel’s striking prose and weird energy often reminds me more of Pynchon, particularly Against the Day: anarchists, secret histories, wandering philosophers, failed utopian projects, and people living just outside official reality. The tramps of Acid Green Velvet think of themselves as “Night People, people unimpressed by hours.”

Krilanovich depicts tramp culture as an ever-regenerative series of performances. Paulette reinvents herself. Rodney reinvents himself. Tramps invent philosophies. Yeggs invent machines and conspiracies. Labor organizers invent futures. Mystics invent cosmologies. In Acid Green Velvet, American drifter culture plays like a form of outsider art. The recurring question is not who these people are, but how long they can sustain the characters they’ve created for themselves.

The prose is remarkable. Here’s Paulette trying to describe the city that forms around the tramp occupation:

The Main Stem was a pageant, a gathering of the tribes: vagrants as sailors, vagrants as concrete men, sandwich counter girls, fieldworkers, baby handlers, food tasters, range salesmen. Vagrants as sporting girls, stoat farmers, and rat trappers. A generation from now people would pretend to know what happened here, would insist on the idea that some authoritative entity was present. Digging up the bones of our community they would pretend to comprehend the story of alien ancestors, whose skeletons lay scattered in party positions in graves dug by drunkards and sleepwalkers.

That paragraph captures an enormous amount of what Acid Green Velvet is doing. Histories emerge from rumors and communities spring from accident. The notion of a governing authority is retrospective fantasy. The people making history usually look ridiculous while they’re making it.

Yegg is one of the novel’s bywords. In Krilanovich’s hands, the term expands into something grander than its traditional meaning of burglar. The yegg is the signal class of Anzar: the tinkerer, the schemer, the amateur engineer of reality itself. Krilanovich’s yeggs build machines, rig scams, spark riots, construct impossible social theories, and generally behave like avant-garde artists set loose in a hobo jungle. Anzar is for the yeggs: people taking apart the world in hopes that something better might emerge from the pieces. Or just taking.

The labor politics are similarly strange. The conflict between tramps, workers, Loganberries, businessmen, and civic authorities is never reduced to a simple ideological struggle because almost nobody in Acid Green Velvet possesses a stable political identity to begin with. The novel is obsessed with disguises and assumed identities. On the very first pages Paulette worries that Rodney may have seen her “without my mask”; later Kenneth is described “shedding his disguise” after the attempted murder, while Johnny drifts between aristocratic elegance and “an affected laborer costume.” Ideology itself begins to feel like another role available for temporary use. People drift in and out of movements with the same improvisational energy that drives their grifts, romances, and self-created mythologies.

If the yegg is the novel’s core social class, its central moral category is sloppiness. The charge appears everywhere. Characters call each other sloppy along with variations on the theme: obvious, transparent, careless, “not smart.” A sloppy person is not necessarily unintelligent; they simply fail to manage the performance. They reveal motive, let the mask slip, tip their hand. In the shadow economy of grifters, radicals, and self-appointed prophets, that failure is a mortal sin.

Paulette, Rodney, and sundry other characters operate with cool sharpness, surviving through control, concealment, and manipulation. Kenneth Greycroft, on the other hand, does not. Kenneth is perhaps the sloppiest person in the novel, “sloppy as hell, oblivious and obvious by turns,” as Johnny Hasley describes him.

Kenneth’s sloppiness makes him the novel’s emotional center. To call him the novel’s heart would work, but the stomach is an even more appropriate organ. Everything passes through him: longing, guilt, labor politics, grief, violence, fantasy, jealousy, and desire. He absorbs and digests; he hungers, loves too visibly, grieves too visibly.

Krilanovich repeatedly frames Kenneth as someone incapable of protecting himself through self-mythology:

He’d always insisted his eyes looked forward only, though the view was occluded by a beige, ambient suffering. He was effectively blind, grappling over a forbidden landscape. Innocent.

That final word, innocent, does an enormous amount of work. Kenneth is obsessive, self-pitying, sentimental, and often catastrophically wrong. Yet his transparency increasingly comes to look like a form of innocence when set beside the machinations of Rodney, old man Hasley, and especially Little Dennis, a diminutive trickster who inserts himself into Johnny’s life like a parasite in the novel’s final third.

Kenneth’s innocence should not be confused with virtue. He plans and attempts a murder; he stalks Paulette across California. He routinely mistakes obsession for devotion. But unlike many of the novel’s other characters, he never succeeds in sealing himself off from consequence. While characters like Rodney and Little Dennis attempt to bend reality to their own purposes, Kenneth remains trapped inside the ordinary human experiences of guilt, longing, jealousy, and grief.

Rich kid Johnny represents the opposite tendency. He responds to the chaos of Anzar by closing himself off. With the aid of Little Dennis’s potions and notions, Johnny insulates himself from history, politics, and even ordinary human contact by constructing a private world governed by his own aesthetic and philosophical obsessions:

“My dream is to run amok in a realm of my own creation,” he said. … “Now, Paulette, we both know the world outside is a dangerous place beset on all sides with evil. The less flesh exposed to the elements the better.”

That impulse gradually becomes the defining tragedy of his character. While Paulette continually reshapes herself in response to circumstance, Johnny attempts to build a reality in which circumstance can no longer reach him. Hasley Manor transforms into an increasingly elaborate fantasy space ruled by mysticism, ritual, occult systems, self-help philosophies, attendants, acolytes, and eventually outright delusion.

Paulette spends the novel trying to escape definition. Johnny increasingly tries to transform reality into a private dream. Kenneth follows both through the wreckage.

Alongside them stands Shelly, perhaps the novel’s most compelling foil for Paulette. Shelly is a charismatic organizer, opportunist, idealist, and manipulator whose search for collective liberation contrasts with Paulette’s determination to preserve her own autonomy. Paulette survives by slipping away from structures of power; Shelly tries to seize those structures and remake them. Her revolutionary community offers a genuine alternative to the fathers, lovers, employers, and wealthy eccentrics who otherwise determine the terms of women’s lives, but Krilanovich also shows how quickly a movement built around liberation can develop its own rules, hierarchies, and demands. Shelly doesn’t simply represent the answer to Paulette’s isolation. She exposes the problem of finding freedom without reproducing another system of control.

Krilanovich eventually pushes this question beyond self-invention and into history itself. Beneath the tramp occupations, labor unrest, yegg philosophies, and revolutionary dreams lies a history of erased women: imprisoned wives, missing mothers, hidden rooms, buried infants, and generations of suffering concealed beneath respectable wealth. Acid Green Velvet’s final third plays as a horrific Gothic excavation, with haunted Hasley Manor serving as an archive of disappearance.

I’ve barely begun to cover everything the novel contains. I have barely touched the dream sequences, occult cosmologies, supernatural horrors, bizarre visions and apparitions, hidden chambers, prophetic trances, haunted histories, and eruptions of genuine dread. Nor have I said much about the sheer density of Krilanovich’s invention. Every time Acid Green Velvet seems poised to settle into a labor novel, a Gothic romance, a grifter story, or a historical epic, it mutates into something stranger.

The title obliquely captures the novel’s paradoxical atmosphere: Acid Green Velvet is simultaneously lush and corrosive, beautiful and decaying, comic and horrifying. Krilanovich braids genres and images until Anzar pulses like a collective hallucination sustained by tramps, mystics, radicals, confidence artists, and dreamers talking one another into existence.

The pleasures of Acid Green Velvet lie in its language, its strangeness, and its astonishing capacity for surprise. Krilanovich has created a novel as unruly, excessive, and alive as the hobo kingdom at its center — excessive, exhausting, funny, grotesque, and frequently brilliant. Very highly recommended.

Pynchon in French and Ballard’s Creation, Krilanovich’s Acid, Shaky Knees, beat by weather etc.

Any time I visit Atlanta, I have to stop by A Capella Books. I walked down there from Little Five Points, where my wife and son were still looking around. I have never seen L5P so busy, thick with hipsters young and old and even older who were killing hours, like we were, I suppose, before the first set of bands that night at the Shaky Knees festival in Piedmont Park. A Capella was pleasantly empty, for the most part.

I picked up a first American edition of J.G. Ballard’s 1987 novel The Day of Creation. Not Ballard’s finest, not his worst; the collector in me thought it should go home with me.

After some downtime at a rental we walked to Piedmont Park for the first night of Shaky Knees, an outdoor music festival featuring four stages in the sweltering swooning swanning sauna September heat. I am very much not a Music Festival Guy, but I wanted to see some of the bands in this year’s lineup, and my son wanted to see even more of the bands — so we made a family trip of it.

We arrived not quite an hour before the psyop (?) indie sensation Geese were to start their set. A band called Hot Mulligan were playing; I had tried to listen to a little bit of their music on the drive up to Atlanta (I did this for pretty much all the bands I hadn’t heard before), and it was decidedly Not For Me. I did like their live sound though, and especially the singer’s charisma. Oh who the fuck am I kidding — I guess he really just won me over when he implored the crowd to “Boo the VIP section!” (Shaky Knees, like every other thing in America right now, is a capitalist swine scam: shaded areas barricaded off for the richies to rest, covered stadium seating for the very rich richies to enjoy their punk-indie-etc., $35 margaritas, a little village of “brand partner experiences” where you could, if you were so stupidly inclined, take pictures in front of a Sierra Nevada “immersion room.” So fuckin punk!). Anyway, speaking of rich kids–

I tried to watch the band Geese with an open mind. My son likes their record and he generally has good taste. The crowd seemed to like what they were doing, which was really just a shoddy whiny blues-rock thing expressed in impoverished chords. One of the guitar players was wearing a Melt Banana t-shirt. I opened for Melt Banana at a record store in like 1999 or 2000, a piece of information that dramatically drove up my esteem in my son’s eyes. I thought Geese were genuinely bad at playing their instruments, their songs were boring, and, worst of all, their guitar tone was terrible.

Luckily Danny Elfman played next. For some reason, this legend was consigned to the smallest stage at the festival, tucked back in the hills of the park (I would see Geordie Greep there later, as well as some of the Bone Thugs-n-Harmony set). Elfman plays a lot of Oingo Boingo songs mixed in with some of the greatest hits of his scores. He plays with a full rock band, orchestra, and choir. It’s totally fucked up and amazing. If there had been a roof over the park it would’ve exploded when they played “This Is Halloween”; what’s left of the metaphorical roof would have disintegrated during The Simpsons theme. I am not, like, a Danny Elfman fan–but I guess I’m Gen X or whatever, and I suppose I really enjoy weird but very accomplished musicianship. Also, Danny Elfman is like 73 and totally jacked. (Google him.)

We caught the end of Fontaines D.C. (great show from a band I didn’t really care about) and then (speaking of rich kids), watched headliners The Strokes. I was impressed by their show — they seemed to understand the assignment and Played the Hits and Mostly That First Album.

Geordie Greep shreddin'.
Geordie Greep shreddin’.

Next day, Saturday, was generally a weaker lineup, but it featured the two acts I most wanted to see: Geordie Greep and Pavement. I’d caught Greep last week in Jacksonville, a show I didn’t know was going to happen back when I bought the Shaky tickets. Both shows were excellent. If you don’t know Greep’s stuff, it’s kinda like Zappa or King Crimson with the horny Philip-Roth-persona lyrics delivered in a crooning but theatrical style, a mix of David Lee Roth and Meat Loaf. His album The New Sound was my favorite of 2024 and pretty much everyone I’ve tried to play it for has hated it, other than my son. The day was blazing, so we scooted back to the rental, rested, and returned for Blood Orange. Their set started great but was then interrupted by lightning and thunder and then a torrential downpour and an evacuation of the park. No Pavement for your boy! I got beat by weather.

I consoled myself with recollecting the show I saw back in, what was it, ’95, ’96, with Royal Trux opening? They were fucking terrible at that show. We trudged home in inches of thick gross water. I watched the Florida-Auburn game on my laptop, another consolation. (Feed my thrill.)

We spent too much of Sunday at Piedmont Park. I think there were like 50,000 people there. It was Hot as Fuck. I was impressed by Santigold’s set, which was high energy despite the astounding, oppressive heat. My son was looking forward to Modest Mouse and was disappointed, much as I had been disappointed way back in, what was it, ’98, ’99 when I first saw them shit the bed in a boozy concert in Gainesville? (I should disclose that their front man later lived down the street from me for a season and was a notorious total dick to everyone in the scene and generally thought he was like, too cool for school I guess.) They sounded thin and unenthusiastic.

Wu-Tang Clan were unexpectedly fantastic — I mean, I love those early albums, but I honestly expected them to phone it in, but they played all the “hits” with enthusiasm and energy. LCD Soundsystem turned out to be the highlight of the festival. I’ve loved some of their tracks over the years, but soured on the band when they made an enormous fuckin’ deal about disbanding (I mean they made a film about it!) only to reunite — but they were great. I’m generally ambivalent about headliners Gorillaz, but they sounded great, played all the hits, and had an impressive roster of features show up in person, including Del the Funky Homosapien, who capped the festival with a rousing rendition of “Clint Eastwood.”

Unable to sleep, my ears ringing, I finished the novel I’d been reading on the trip,Grace Krilanovich’s Acid Green Velvet. This is a novel about hoboes, grifters, yeggs, anarchists, socialists, cults and movements and capital and anti-capital. It takes place in some alternate version of the end of the nineteenth century, in some alternate California. Acid Green Velvet is surreal and sinister and funny and sexy and gross; it’s part horror, part social satire, part historical thriller, part part part part part…Look, I loved this novel, Acid Green Velvet. Maybe fifty, sixty pages in it really sank into me, or I really sank into it. It reminds me strongly of Thomas Pynchon’s work, particularly Against the Day, with which it shares many themes and motifs, as well as Slothrop’s toilet adventures in Gravity’s Rainbow (it’s, uh, abject). It’s not just the themes, but also the oblique, layered, surrealistic/mystical style of Krilanovich’s prose that recalls Pynchon’s style. Her approach is, to be clear, in no way an imitation or approximation, but rather blood that flows from the same vein. (The phrase against the day pops up late in the novel, by the way.) Proper review to come.

And more Pynchon:

When I got back home, I had a package from Paris — Nicolas Richard’s new French translation of Pynchon’s latest novel Shadow Ticket:

Nicolas got in touch with me early last year, and we corresponded for a few months about the novel. Answering his questions and trying out some of his phrasing was some of the most fun I’ve had in years. It was like reading the novel again through different eyes, different ears. Nicolas was kind enough to include me in his acknowledgements, which is one of the biggest little thrills of my life:

Grace Krilanovich’s Acid Green Velvet (Book acquired, 4 May 2026)

I dug Grace Krilanovich’s “Slutty Teenage Hobo Vampire Junkies” novel The Orange Eats Creeps, calling it good gross stuff in a 2020 review.

Her follow up, Acid Green Velvet, is forthcoming this summer from Two Dollar Radio. Their blurb:

In the late 19th century on the central California coast, two wayward young hoboes — Paulette and Kenneth — threaten to kill a menacing man who wronged them: Paulette’s father, Rodney Eligon.

A handful of years later, the town of Anzar has become the stomping grounds for all manner of cults, eccentrics, earth religions, and communal living. Presiding over the town from the luxe frivolity of their family manor, the Hasleys have ruled Anzar for generations. Their grip on the town is threatened by the rise of the working class, and their union with the itinerant population. Meanwhile, Paulette has taken up residence in the home of Johnny Hasley, a wealthy faux-socialist poseur, hoping to become his wife. Her plans are complicated by boot-prints in the garden signaling the arrival of Kenneth, who carries with him a dark secret that poses a grave threat to both of them.

In Anzar’s cracked mirror, Californian freakiness meets Victorian preoccupations with the domestic, pollution and filth, haunted houses, fringe societies, living death, spiritualism, vampiric women, and class parasites. Acid Green Velvet is a surreal powder keg of nihilism, fathers and their failures, manifest destiny, and American identity, penned in rapturous prose by the fiercest writer of her generation.

Blog about The Orange Eats Creeps, Grace Krilanovich’s Slutty Teenage Hobo Vampire Junkies novel

Hey, it’s Halloween, spooky times, dark times, right? So here’s a novel recommendation: Grace Krilanovich’s “Slutty Teenage Hobo Vampire Junkies” novel The Orange Eats Creeps.

Here is the first paragraph of The Orange Eats Creeps:

The sun is setting. The hobo vampires are waking up, their quest for crank and blood is just beginning. Over the course of the frigid night they will roam the area surrounding the train stop looking for warm bodies to suck, for cough syrup to fuel a night of debauched sexual encounters with fellow vampires and mortals alike. They distribute sexually transmitted diseases like the daily newspaper but they will never succumb, they will never die, just aging into decrepit losers inside a teenage shell. They have a sense of duty to their habit and their climax — twin addictions that inform their every move. They are lusty, sad creatures, these Slutty Teenage Hobo Vampire Junkies. They traverse the Pacific Northwest’s damp, shitty countryside, forests and big trees, the dusty fields and gravel pits clearing a path of desolation parallel to the rail lines of Oregon and Washington, the half-blown-out signs for supermarket chains in strip malls featuring exactly one nail place, one juice-slash-coffee place, and one freshmex-type grill chain restaurant. Here everything is coated in brown-grey paste like moss at the bottom of a crappy tree…

Krilanovich’s novel is coated in brown-grey paste, an accumulation of scum and cum and blood, a vampiric solution zapped by orange bolts of sex, pain, drugs, and rocknroll. It’s a riot grrrl novel, a psychobilly novel, a crustgoth novel. It’s a fragmented, ugly, revolting mess and I loved it. The Orange Eats Creeps is “A vortex of a novel,” as Steve Erickson puts it in his introduction, that will alternately suck in or repel readers.

The vortex of The Orange Eats Creeps recalls another black hole, Charles Burns’s Black Hole, also set in the Pacific Northwest, also crawling through subcultural punk detritus. Visually and thematically, there are also echoes of Kathryn Bigelow’s 1987 film Near Dark, Tim Hunter’s 1986 film River’s Edge, and Harmony Korine’s 1997 film Gummo. (And yeah, I’m sure a long essay could be worked out in the ways that this book grimes the gilt glam from Joel Schumacher’s 1987 film The Lost Boys.)

As a prose stylist, Krilanovich recalls Kathy Acker or William Burroughs, and the vomitiness and abject bodiness of it all is reminiscent of Julia Kristeva’s theory. Krilanovich’s style seems to have roots in punk rock, in zines, and cut-ups, in theft and weird Xerox collages. The novel is fragmentary, random. We’re trapped—trapped?—in the narrator’s ESP-consciousness, zipping through time and space, drugged out, immortal, wishing to nullify time and space, to achieve a comforting and insensate zero.

All the shooting galleries and basement punk shows and drugstore robberies and gallon buckets of cold coffee won’t be everyone’s cup of tea. Readers looking for a tightly-plotted vampire novel will find themselves frustrated. The lore here is a separate lore: foster families and parking lots and quick scores and quicker sex. The world is boxcars and group homes and 7-Elevens. But there’s plenty of weirdness: vampire boys, punk rock legends and would-be legends, a warlock, a serial killer called Dactyl, the Donner Party, and ESP, ESP, ESP. There’s a core quest: The narrator searches for her sister. Maybe the quest is a metaphor; hell, maybe vampirism itself is a metaphor in The Orange Eats Creeps. It doesn’t matter.

What matters is the aesthetic impression, a swirl of images, words, and motifs coagulating around the reader’s mind’s eye. The Orange Eats Creeps is a survey of consciousness in crisis—the crisis of late capitalism, with vampires making their way through a gig economy, addicted, transient, desperate, enthralled to a particularly Western weirdness. It doesn’t all work, but who cares? Good gross stuff.

Oreo/Orange (Books acquired, 13 July 2020)

img_5778

I’m like 50 pages from the end of Fran Ross’s 1974  Oreo and I simply don’t understand how this novel is so erased or ignored in most discussions of postmodern classics. (It could be ignorance—mine for sure—or erasure, or sure, structural racism in publishing and literary criticism—I mean, I feel like every list that compels someone to read Thomas Pynchon and Kathy Acker and John Barth and Stanley Elkin and Ishmael Reed and Robert Coover should include Fran Ross, Fran Ross’s novel Oreo, Fran Ross’s only novel Oreo, why is there only one novel by Fran Ross, Oreo? What I’m trying to say is: Why didn’t I read this until now? Although reading it now has felt like a gift of some kind.)

This thing—Oreo, that is—zapped me on like page three or four with this ditty–

Ec1_7BJXkAUYc1q

I mean, c’mon!

I owe Oreo a proper write-up, if I can ever muster such a thing again, which maybe I can’t.

I also picked up, almost entirely at random, Grace Krilanovich’s novel The Orange Eats Creeeps. The spine and title struck me, I saw it was a Two Dollar Radio publication, and when I fished it from the shelf, I read Steve Erickson’s blurb and just went with it. Here’s Two Dollar’s blurb:

A girl with drug-induced ESP and an eerie connection to Patty Reed (a young member of the Donner Party who credited her survival to her relationship with a hidden wooden doll), searches for her disappeared foster sister along “The Highway That Eats People,” stalked by a conflation of Twin Peaks’ “Bob” and the Green River Killer, known as Dactyl.

I also found a Donald Barthelme collection with an Edward Gorey cover:

2020-07-16_161411