David Markson Describes the Physical Limitations of Three Philosophers

3 thoughts on “David Markson Describes the Physical Limitations of Three Philosophers”

  1. Eric Idle Describes the Alcoholic Non-Limitations of Fourteen Philosophers

    Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable.
    Heidegger, Heidegger was a boosey beggar who could think you under the table.
    David Hume could out-consume Shoppenhauer and Hegel,
    And Wittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as schloshed as Schloegel.
    There’s nothin’ Nietzsche couldn’t teach ya ’bout the raisin’ of the wrist;
    Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed.

    John Stuart Mill, of his own free will, after half a pint of shard was particularly ill.
    Plato, they say, could stick it away, half a crate of whiskey every day.
    Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle, Hobbes was fond of his dram.
    And René Déscartes was a drunken fart, “I drink therefore I am.”
    Yes Socrates, himself, is particularly missed: A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he’s pissed.


  2. Is it wrong of me to think that David Markson is the most important fiction (?) writer of the last 25 years? Because I do. I think his work is going to outlast almost everyone else’s.


    1. I think he’s maybe the great canon-maker of the early twenty-first century. I’m working on a bigger thing about W’s M and the four citation “novels” after it; the quote the other day from the Flann O’Brien is part of that.


Your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.