The apparatus consists of a tall, upright frame with a weighted and angled blade suspended at the top.
The condemned is secured with a pillory at the bottom of the frame, holding the position of the neck directly below the blade.
The blade is then released, swiftly and forcefully decapitating the condemned with a single, clean pass; the head falls into a basket or other receptacle below.
The design of the apparatus — more reliable and less painful for the condemned — was conceived in accordance with enlightened ideals of human rights.
The apparatus took the name of the physician who proposed its implementation. He was a noted opponent of the death penalty and was displeased with the breaking wheel. He did not invent the apparatus.
The physician brought his proposal to a committee. The committee sought inspiration from precursor apparatuses. Many of these prior instruments crushed the neck or used blunt force to take off a head, but a number of them also used a crescent blade to behead and a hinged two-part yoke to immobilize the victim’s neck.
The committee brought their proposal to the sovereign, who caused such an apparatus to be designed and built. The engineer for the prototype was noted as a designer of harpsichords.
The state’s official executioner claimed in his memoirs that the sovereign, an amateur locksmith, recommended that the device employ an oblique blade rather than a crescent one, lest the blade not be able to sever all necks; the sovereign’s own neck was offered up discreetly as an example.
The first specimen to test the apparatus was a highwayman. He was led to the scaffold wearing a red shirt.
The apparatus was also red in color.
A large crowd had gathered. The event took only a few seconds.
The crowd was dissatisfied with the apparatus. They felt it was too swift and clinically effective to provide proper entertainment. They cried out for the wheel, the sword, the wooden gallows.
But the enlightened ones hailed the apparatus as a success.
And in time, the general public grew to love the apparatus too.
The apparatus acquired many fond nicknames:
The Regretful Climb
The National Razor
The Fanlight
The Widow
The Silence Mill
The Machine
The Paper Trimmer
Capet’s Necktie
The Patriotic Shortener
The Half-Moon
The Timbers of Justice
Charlot’s Rocking-chair
The apparatus was wildly successful. Over 17,000 persons were subjected to it over just a thirteen-month period.
(That 17,000 included such notables as the sovereign himself.)
But over time, the enlightened and the general public alike grew bored with the apparatus. It had once been proudly displayed and attended and utilized in the city’s grandest plazas, but over the decades the apparatus was moved to more and more discreet locations, out of the public eye.
It was officially retired by the state’s government just short of two centuries of service.
But its memory and example endures.


















