Biblioklept is twenty years old today

Biblioklept is twenty years old today.

I was 27 when I started the blog which I guess means I’m 47 now. The blog is older than both of my children (it is almost exactly nine months older than my oldest child).

More data:

I published 167 posts between 9 Sept. 2006 and 9 Sept. 2007, Biblioklept’s inaugural year. This was right around the time blogging went fully mainstream and right before social media platforms started to sink their claws into the zeitgeist. Two friends of mine had started blogs and they both independently suggested I start one, so I did. The early years of this blog are littered with posts referencing their blogs and other blogs, blogs long since defunct. One of those friends is now dead. The other friend I am no longer friends with for reasons I actually can’t even fully remember. 

Not sure of what to post for Biblioklept’s vigintennial, I spent an afternoon this weekend browsing through that first year of posts. Biblioklept was initially, ostensibly, a blog about books I had procured, pocketed, pinched, and purloined. I described outright thefts along with tomes I never returned. I also wrote about books that people “borrowed” and never gave back to me (including many, many students). I eventually took up writing, or trying to write, real “reviews” of books. Biblioklept barely had an audience the first few months, but by the end of the year the readership had grown, in large part thanks to these longer reviews, and also, I think, because of a general brattiness to the site. I was 27, like I said; I felt much older than the millennial Brooklyn hipsters all my friends lived among far North from my Florida, and I was much younger than the established literary voices that had segued from the print into the digital world. My takes on books and film and music were often uncharitable, snotty, uninformed, or just plain mean-spirited. Perhaps more cringeworthy to me are novels and films I heaped undue praise upon. I could link to lots of specific examples, but I won’t.

Scrolling through posts from 9 Sept. 2006 to 9 Sept. 2007, I was struck by a few things — how loose and chaotic the blog was, how free it seemed, how clearly aimed at an audience of maybe 10, 15 people, and how very very very angry I was all the time. A searing hatred of the Bush regime comes through in those early posts; early Biblioklept is soaked in the post-9/11 zeitgeist. Too, those early posts emanate a strange, subtle, and unacknowledged anxiety about what I might now call early millennial (or Millennial if you prefer) hipster culture. Maybe I was afraid of losing my edge to the art-school Brooklynites in little jackets with their borrowed nostalgia (I actually remembered the eighties).

As far as I can tell, I didn’t receive any review copies or advance reader copies until around November of 2007. In just a few short years it became impossible to keep up with all the books that came in. By 2010 the audience for the blog had dramatically expanded (even as blog readership on the whole declined). I was able to monetize the blog via the WordPress ads program, but I eventually abandoned that commercial practice.

I was also posting a lot more. More unasked-for data: I published 2409 posts between 9 Sept. 2013 and 9 Sept. 2014. That’s too many posts! I picked that year — call it 2014 — because I’d say that was the last little gasp of the blogosphere’s cultural relevance. Blogs still exist, sure, but they are institutional, professional, and (to employ a term that will read as very mid-twenties ten years from now), niche.

I hope that Biblioklept is still a niche blog, dedicated loosely to art and reading and books, particularly oddballish literature. But as far as the biblioklept niche: I have of course long since run out of book theft stories to tell because I haven’t stolen a book in decades.

That last sentence is a lie; I took a small tract from a house I was renting on Anacapri in June last year, an Italian translation of Alexandre Dumas’ Capri. I would like to say I took it with the intention of returning it one day. I left a deposit, one of the two physical books I took with me to Italy that summer. The theft in question, Capri, is pictured below, nestled in a new old bookcase my father-in-law told me to take.

The Dumas is posed here; its natural place in the house is in a cache of small flat tracts I store horizontally in a box in a bundle. The books it sits among are seeking shelves, or reviews, or simply my tired reading eyes. They are recent acquisitions, books to be read, and occasional redundancies. They occupy roughly one sixth of the shelf’s apparent volume; more if I double stack. I’ll try to go about filling the case slowly in this next year, 9 Sept. 2026 through 9 Sept. 2027.

I will also probably post more slowly, or more sparingly, or more sporadically (I’ll find an adverb that fits). More data (last, I promise): I published about 300 posts in the last year (9 Sept. 2025-9 Sept. 2026). I think I can deflate a bit, no? Aim for something closer to that inaugural run of just over 150 posts. Let things wind down. I’ve carved this niche and I’m comfortable in it, but I can’t go on with this thing forever. Can I?

Blog about the etymology of the word “blog”

The Oxford English Dictionary defines blog as

A frequently updated website, typically run by a single person and consisting of personal observations arranged in chronological order, excerpts from other sources, hyperlinks to other sites, etc.; an online journal or diary;

—and then notes that the term blog is in more common use than its etymon, or parent word, weblog. 

The earliest quotation the OED gives in association with the etymon weblog is from 1993: 

comp.infosystems.www (Usenet newsgroup) 10 Nov. (title of posting)    Announcing getsites 1.5, a Web log analyzer.

This example though does not really point to the source of blog; rather, it’s an example of the OED’s first definition of weblog:

Usually as two words. A file containing a detailed record of each request received by a web server, frequently recording data that allows a variety of different aspects of the web traffic reaching that server to be analysed.

This definition differs from the second definition the OED gives for weblog, which is synonymous with the definition for blog above.

A quotation given by the OED under the entry for blog from 1999 points (somewhat humorously) to the sundering of web and blog into a new word:

[1999   http://www.bradlands.com (blog) 23 May (O.E.D. Archive)    Cam points out lemonyellow.com and PeterMe decides the proper way to say ‘weblog’ is ‘wee’- blog’ (Tee-hee!).]

The OED attributes the PeterMe blog (by Peter Merholz) with a more direct citation for the word blog, dating from 1999:

For those keeping score on blog commentary from outside the blog community.

(A 1999 entry cited from the Edinburgh Scotsman cites the word with an apostrophe: ‘blog).

Blog as a verb, as well as blogger and blogging all get citations going back to 1999.

The Online Etymology Dictionary gives the following entry for blog:

1998, short for weblog (which is attested from 1994, though not in the sense “online journal”), from (World Wide)Web (n.) + log (n.2). Joe Bloggs (c. 1969) was British slang for “any hypothetical person” (compare U.S. equivalent Joe Blow); earlier blog meant “a servant boy” in one of the college houses (c. 1860, see Partridge, who describes this use as a “perversion of bloke“), and, as a verb, “to defeat” in schoolboy slang. The Blogger online publishing service was launched in 1999.

Weblog is of course a portmanteau of web and log, both of which are abstract and concrete, new and very old. In The Origins of English Words: A Discursive Dictionary of Indo-European Roots, Joseph T. Shipley gives the root of web as uebh:

uebh(s): weave, move back and forth; objects woven or the like, as a honeycomb. Pers, baft: woven cotton cloth. Gk huphe: web. hypha: threadlike part of fungus

Shipley gives over a dozen other examples that generate from uebh including hymn, hymen, vespa, wasp, weaver, woof, waffle, wave, and gopher. 

Shipley’s root for log is presumably leg I (he doesn’t list log in his Index of English Words). Shipley gives his definition of leg I:

leg I: gather, set in order, consider, choose; then read, speak. Gk, logos, logion, horologe, horology, lexicon.

Shipley gives leg I as the source of many words, but helpful to our etymology of blog are intellect, illegitimate, select, legend, sacrilege, sortilege, collect, and cull.

The entry for leg II is of course beneath the entry for leg I. Shipley points to this as the root of (among others) lax, laxative, delay, relay, languid, languish, lash, lush, profuse, leach, leak and lack. Any of these will fit into a proper etymology of blog too, I suppose.

Tumblr, Supper’s Ready, Bibliokid, Unrelated Owl

Thanks to Bobby Tomorrowland for hipping me to Tumblr. This is probably the simplest, cleanest way to blog; it’s actually kind of addictive. Check out Bob’s new blog Supper’s Ready, and my new blog, Bibliokid, and then say, “Jeez, I can do better than that,” and make your own damn blog.

Unrelated owl:

wildlife_barn_owl.jpg