
Some content on this page was disabled on May 26, 2021 as a result of a DMCA takedown notice from Gary Larson. You can learn more about the DMCA here:

Some content on this page was disabled on May 26, 2021 as a result of a DMCA takedown notice from Gary Larson. You can learn more about the DMCA here:



Existentialism has been accused of being defeatist and depressing (and Sartre didn’t help his cause with terms like ‘abandonment’, ‘despair’, and ‘nausea’). But Peanuts also demonstrates the optimism of the philosophy. Why does Charlie Brown continue to go out to the pitcher’s mound, despite his 50 year losing streak? Why try to kick the football, when Lucy has always pulled it away at the last second? Because there is an infinite gap between the past and the present. Regardless of what has come before, there is always the possibility of change. Monstrous freedom is a double edged sword. We exist, and are responsible. This is both liberating and terrifying.
From “Sartre & Peanuts” by Nathan Radke.

I was pleasantly surprised to get a box of great stuff in the mail from Ryan Mihaly, a frequent contributor to this blog (check out the second part of his interview with translator Ilan Stavans). Inside the handsome Penguin Classics Goethe was this little card:


I had never even heard of The Thoughtbook, Fitzgerald’s boyhood diary. Sample:


Tom Clark is The Best.


And always Hell.

Thanks again, Ryan!








