The day after my birthday, I got the review copy I’d requested of Jean-Baptiste Del Amo’s novel The Son of Man. It was a nice late gift, hungover as I was from a surprise party for my sister-in-law’s 40th, a surprise party which usurped a rare Friday birthday of my own (meet me in 2030 on a Friday (or don’t)). I loved Frank Wynne’s translation of Del Amo’s previous novel, Animalia, suggesting in a 2020 reading round up that the novel “is a visceral, naturalistic, and very precise rendering of humans as animals. . . . Animalia made me physically ill at times. It’s an excellent novel.”
I read the first forty pages of The Son of Man this afternoon; the opening fifteen pages in particular foreground the humans-as-animals dynamic that Animalia worked through. These pages seem like an overture for the novel. They focus on a prehistoric troop of hunter-gatherers, like, hunting and gathering. It’s marvelous. The novel then pivots, I dunno, a couple of thousand years or so to a contemporary scene. We’re somewhere in France; a man and a woman and a boy leave a city in a car and go into the mountains, eventually pressing towards a ruined estate. A dread starts to thicken. The anxiety congeals more from the gaps in the standard cerebral cause-and-effect that we might expect from a novel which isn’t so much replaced as supplanted by precise, lucid detailing of the physical world. Consider this description of the mother:
She lights a cigarette, exhales a first plume of smoke — she holds the filter between the distal phalanges of her index and middle fingers, close to the nails — walks down the central reservation of yellowed grass, then retraces her steps. She brings the cigarette to her lips, darting brief glances that linger on the shadows nesting in the branches of trees and in privet hedges.
Del Amo’s prose, via Wynne’s limpid translation, works like a camera. More thoughts to come. Publisher’s blurb here if you like.
Biblioklept 