Gods, monsters, and cosmic weirdos battle for ultimate supremacy in Jesse Moynihan’s stellar graphic novel Forming

In Jesse Moynihan’s Forming, horny, neurotic, power-mad weirdos battle for supremacy, and in the process generate (and degenerate) the universe. Moynihan’s mutants can alter reality by force of will (and force of force) but they can barely manage their own appetites and grudges. It’s great fucking stuff.

Forming throws biblical genealogy, Greek succession myths, and Zoroastrian cosmology into a whirlpool of family disasters. We’ve got angels, aliens, and assassins. We’ve got giants, pissed-off proles, sudden whales and psychedelic geometric entities. We’ve got a cypher, a grinning black crescent in hot-pink boots named Nobody. Forming treats mythology as one enormous pulsing contradictory history, breaking familiar stories apart and rebuilding them as episodes in an ongoing struggle for power. The cosmic and the ridiculous are inseparable, and nobody, however exalted, is above the fray.

Moynihan’s epic begins in modest earnest ironic cartooning. Forming’s earliest pieces are one-pagers, little machines: setup, escalation, punchline. Consider this gag, in which Noah’s attempt at friendly solidarity swerves into class grievances and violent threats:

Elsewhere, Lucifer gets goosed by a ghost:

The jokes are more than tone-setting japes; they lead to worldbuilding. Atlantis emerges from labor dispute. Archangel Michael and Lucifer battle and banter in the metaphysical background. Insults, misunderstandings, and casual brutality establish cosmic hierarchies. Moynihan builds his epic sideways: setups produce universes; punchlines produce consequences.

William Blake is a clear progenitor for Forming (both visually and schematically) — particularly the Blake of The Book of Urizen and The Four Zoas, where creation begins with division and cosmic history is a rough family album chronicling the gods’ goddamned damaged relations. Throughout Blake’s mythology, the elevation of a partial perspective into absolute truth produces division and conflict.

Moynihan pricks this predicament with a spur of emphatically comic physical life. His gods and demiurges can alter reality through force of will, yet remain tangled up in their rivalries, passions, and shortsighted ambitions. Janus asks a squad of assassins: “Is the power of your belief strong enough to change this reality?” — a Blakean speculation, a nod to imaginative power — but in Forming the answer to that question might play out with somegod getting their ass whooped. Metaphysics and slapstick run on the same aesthetic engine.

One of Forming’s central concerns is the uneasy relationship between (the pretense of) divine authority and the poet/artist who attempts to describe it. This conflict has another literary progenitor in John Milton and his epic Paradise Lost — the fall, the rebellion, divine providence, all that celestial jazz. Moynihan inserts Milton into a brief episode, late in Forming, where the blind poet wrestles with the influence of his own great precursor, Homer. Moynihan’s Milton appeals to God. He needs help in forming his depiction of Michael’s battle with Satan into “something truly badass.” What muse answers?

Milton thinks he’s writing the war in Heaven. The war in Heaven is apparently writing Milton. In Forming, the inspiriting Muse might be an assassin or secret agent, Origins Unknown. Is the poet’s aesthetic vision prompted by the metaphysical, psychological, biological? Does the poet invent his material, receive it, or get recruited into somebody else’s shenanigans?

Blake, of course, had his own complicated relationship with Milton. In Milton: A Poem, the precursor poet’s influence challenges Blake to confront and transform  Milton’s theological and moral framework in favor of his own intuition and imagination. The anxiety of influence becomes a spiritual struggle: literary inheritance is something the younger poet must wrestle with rather than merely receive. Moynihan makes a comic variation on that struggle by putting Milton inside the very mythology he hopes to describe. The poet becomes another participant in the cosmic disorder, the poem its strange, self-creating artifact.

If Blake and Milton inform Forming’s theological and literary complications, Jack Kirby supplies much of the cosmic hardware. Kirby’s Fourth World comics, especially The New Gods, along with his later Marvel series The Eternals, chronicled divine genealogies and technological spectacle in a unique, Kirbyesque (forgive the tautology) visual language that other cartoonists continue to aspire to. Kirby’s gods wield weapons that look like they were designed in a mad god’s laboratory.

Forming draws on that Kirbyesque grandiosity but gives it a distinctly unruly cast. Its gods are similarly conceived as cosmic beings whose bodies, tools, and environments blur the line between divinity and machinery. Michael, Metatron, and Enoch manifest as components of a vast theological apparatus. Cosmic entities employ cool tech. But where Kirby’s monumental designs often project a sense of cosmic authority and immense structural order, Moynihan’s visual scale gestures towards slippery, fecund violent comedy and transcendent disorder. These gods are engineers, colonizers, bureaucrats, sneak thieves and warriors, dysfunctional relatives operating machinery far more sophisticated than they are. It’s all very sloppy, abject, gross. (That’s some of the highest praise I can heap.) And where Kirby’s legendary splash pages rumble like tectonic plates colliding, every punch and energy blast carrying the weight of a cosmic principle, Moynihan’s setpieces retain a playground-fight intensity that resonates with rude emotion. His combatants sound like children inventing special attacks in a backyard brawl. Celestial warfare gives us crystalline weapons and billions of years of history, the “Unblockable Strike” and “NO WAY BOZO!!” Who would not like to be there? To participate, even?

The fights are fucking awesome. Beams, blades, transformations, colossal bodies, and reality-altering attacks give physical form to the comic’s competing creation myths. There’s plenty of cool shit. Moynihan might spend pages on divine entities bickering or goofing around and then deliver a splash page of some impossible brute absolutely whaling on another impossible brute.

Forming’s grandiosity is inseparable from its ridiculousness. An ancient cosmic grievance might end with somebody getting the shit kicked out of them. Sooner or later, though, somebody has to ask whether all this spectacular violence means something or if it’s just like, fucking awesome to look at. Natch, that somebody is Nobody.

Nobody pops up with his sexy pink boots in Forming’s third act to offer metatextual commentary on how stories are made, marketed, and judged. He complains about every “rando dipstick” wanting to make “deep” art, scorns metaphor, and defends entertainment as a product designed to satisfy the broadest possible consumer base. Nommo, whose artistic vision has remade (literally reformed) the planet around them, responds by invoking the hoary old ideal of truth as the “true entertainment” worthy of the soul, higher than the gross marketplace. It’s an ideal that brings a third Dead English Poet to mind, our old dear John Keats, dead at 25, who nevertheless managed immortality with the zinger: “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all / Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.” I’ve never known quite what to make of those lines. Keats, or Keats’s speaker, puts this pronouncement about beauty and truth in the urn’s mouth, which, like, an urn doesn’t fucking have, a mouth, then leaves us wondering who gets to speak for art and whether an artwork can settle its own meaning. That radical aesthetic uncertainty tingles throughout Forming (where an urn certainly could have a mouth, I suppose), staging a loose debate about art and entertainment inside a comic full of dirty jokes and spectacular fights.

Neither position wins — the tension remains. Art might be slipped on like a fancy robe, a disguise for vanity, elitism, and self-coronation. Entertainment can become a product engineered to offend nobody while selling (out) everything. “Content” is both an economically accurate term and a little linguistic coffin into which the distinctions among art, entertainment, criticism, and advertising are tossed (but left unburied).

Moynihan gives himself plenty of room on both sides of the argument. Forming is full of metaphor, philosophy, theological speculation, colossal ambition, and authorial indulgence. It is also full of goofy monsters and obscene punchlines. It wants William Blake and “FUCK YOU GHOST!” It wants Miltonic prophecy and the awesome-shit spectacle of the Unblockable Strike. Its vulgarity is part and parcel of its take on creation, authority, and the desire to make something — art, entertainment, a really cool fucking comic — that other people will take seriously.

Here, Moynihan has something in common with Johnny Ryan and Benjamin Marra, cartoonists whose rough, vulgar surfaces refuse the tasteful separation of trash from art. Ryan’s comics run on unchecked appetite and endless bodily mutation; Marra pushes macho heroics past competence and into ritual. Moynihan is less relentlessly abrasive than Ryan and less committed to Marra’s deadpan masculine theater, but all three understand the expressive possibilities of crudity. An ugly body can puncture heroic pretensions, and an obscene joke can expose the absurdities hidden inside an exalted idea.

In Forming, that crudity brings the sacred insistently back to the body. Moynihan’s gods boast, reproduce, misunderstand instructions, hunger, shit, threaten strangers, and become trapped in forms they cannot control. For all their power, they remain subject to the vanity and confusion animating the comic’s smallest disputes. Even the most exalted being can wind up looking like an idiot. Or really fucking cool. Or really fucking cool and idiotic at the same time.

The comic’s shifting visual forms accommodate these sudden collapses of scale and dignity. Its pages move between compressed gag-strip grids and visionary spectacle, from cramped exchanges of insults to enormous abysses and burning colossi. Moynihan employs a nine-panel grid on most pages, establishing a rhythm of setup and punchline; his dramatic splash pages break out of that rhythm. Underground-comic crudity, psychedelic Hanna-Barbera, and Fletcher Hanks’s grotesque distortions haunt the visual mix, but by the book’s end Moynihan has pushed that unruliness toward something luminous and hallucinatory: the cosmic geometries of Kilian Eng, the psychedelic expansiveness of Moebius, even a Goethean drama of color and perception. The changes in scale become changes in visual logic, as the gag-strip machinery opens onto vast, unstable fields of color, form, and energy.

It all adds up to something genuinely and unexpectedly moving. Moynihan began Forming as a webcomic in 2009 and worked on it, intermittently and with increasing formal ambition, for seventeen years. Over that time, one gag opened onto another creation myth, one family grievance sparked another cosmic war, and each new generation inherited the wreckage of the last. The accumulation of jokes, betrayals, mutations, and apocalyptic battles gradually became an immense, deeply peculiar vision of creation, sustained by Moynihan’s willingness to keep expanding it without ever taming its absurdity.

Fantagraphics’ new complete edition gives that long undertaking an appropriately beautiful physical form. At 448 full-color pages, the hardcover is substantial without becoming unwieldy, handsomely printed and remarkably easy to read despite the density of Moynihan’s cosmology. The crisp reproduction and generous page size let the colors blaze, the crowded grids breathe, and the sudden splashes achieve their full scale. In this latest, perhaps final form, Forming is a masterful achievement.

Yet the book’s arrival at a finished form does not mean that its contradictions settle into place. There is something tender in the persistence with which Moynihan carries these oppositions and eruptions through cosmic violence, deranged theology, and dubious ambition. Forming ultimately suggests that these tensions might be carried forward only by passing into another form. The sacred and the stupid occupy the same panel, sometimes the same body. Creation is an ongoing accident, forever producing creatures who misunderstand the world, alter it, and occasionally reach for one another as everything comes apart in a ridiculous and tender gesture.

Beautiful, bewildering, hilarious, and unexpectedly affecting, Forming is very highly recommended.

Blog about some recent reading

 

I reread Jesse Moynihan’s epic psychedelic graphic novel Forming from in full last night, staying up too late in doing so.

I’d read it in parcels and chunks over the nearly two decades Moynihan worked on it; I also read it in consistent chunky episodes over the past few months, when the nice people (nice person, you know who you are man) sent me a copy of its completed Forming form. But I hadn’t read it from soup to nuts, aye aye to zee, you get me, yeah, until last night.

I will do a proper review of Forming I swear I swear I swear, but reading it through I was genuinely moved, not just by the sheer accomplishment of the thing, the way Moynihan brings his teeming Blakean pantheon of gods and demiurges to heel (or whatever appendage) across an epic of cosmic creation and destruction, but by the weird, tender persistence of the whole enterprise. A comprehensive summary is not necessary (by which I mean too hard for me to muster right now) but–

Forming is William Blake’s prophetic books macrodosed on that good shit, raised on psychedelic Hanna-Barbera cartoons and Fletcher Hanks comics, gods and monsters and angels and demons doing metaphysical slapstick; grotesque, hilarious, strangely beautifully strange.

I’m halfway through The Disappearers by Marlon James. This book got a New York Times review so glowing that it melted half of what’s left of altlittwitter into an incandescent mean girl pose for about five minutes. (I think the vibe has moved on.) That’s my way of saying that no one needs my own take on this.

I’m not gonna lie, the second section of The Disappearers, “The Blackjacks,” was so ugly that I had to take a short lil break and, like, read something else. That was the intention, of course. The novel is painfully real and hurts with a clarity absent from James’s recent Black Leopard novels, which, if I’m honest, I enjoy more. (I have connected very much to James’s evocation of late-eighties-transitioning-to-nineties nostalgia: the music, the grunge, the fear, the Chris Claremont’s Uncanny X-Men of it all.)

Back to the stack, natch: I already reviewed Grace Krilanovich’s Acid Green Velvet, a fantastic novel where

nearly everyone is trying to invent a new self. Tramps become philosophers, grifters become visionaries, labor organizers become prophets, mystics become entrepreneurs, and wealthy eccentrics attempt to turn private fantasies into reality. Set in a fictional California town called Anzar, the novel follows these competing acts of self-creation as they collide, overlap, and occasionally explode.

Loved it loved it loved it, gotta shelve it now.

Goodbye to Goodbye is a new collection of Stephen Dixon’s “greatest hits” (McSweeney’s, the publisher, has not characterized the volume that way). I have a rough draft of a review forthcoming, but basically, if you have any interest in Stephen Dixon, this ain’t a bad place to start. (I will expound upon why you might want to start into Dixon in that review; for now, check out “Frog in Prague,” in which our autofictional hero tries to get to Kafka’s grave.)

Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up to Me by Richard Fariña — I finally read it. I read it because of Thomas Pynchon, who may or may not be the basis of a character in the novel, but who definitely wrote an introduction for it, in my edition and I’m guessing every edition after the first, and who definitely was not Fariña’s best friend or roommate, as the internet somewhat persists in reporting. A drug novel, a would-be travel novel, but really just (just?) a campus novel, Been Down is the kind of jam I would’ve thought profound when I was 20, 21; mostly I found its hero Gnossos Pappadopoulis to be a boor and an asshole — although I think that was also maybe kinda the point. It was often very funny. But not great!

I read Stanley Crawford’s 1978 “novel” Some Instructions to My Wife: Concerning the Upkeep of the House and Marriage, and to My Son and Daughter Concerning the Conduct of Their Childhood over two afternoons. I think Crawford is the best novelist no one has read (not you, dear reader, I know you’re hip to Crawford, Ole Ess Cee) — just a mean satirical hooting raspberry directed at middle-class American values. Makes a nice surreal trilogy with Crawford’s other slim novels The Log of the S.S. The Mrs Unguentine (1972) and Petroleum Man (2005).

Diane Williams’ latest is I Liked Rex. I had been reading one of Williams’ weird microslices a day for a while, until my attention shifted elsewhere, through no fault of Williams or Rex. Here is

“In the Bright Valley”

by

Diane Williams

He is a young man getting in a little extra sleep before the evening, which helps him to feel gen-erous warmth toward others—and to feel opti-mistic.

He had been down on his back on the narrow bench, with his arms hanging down to the floor, and he had taken a nap in the locker room, where he also eats his lunch.

On the job he doesn’t deal with the butter, which builds into a mountain in a glassed-in room, where claws dip down into it.

He minds the milk, and if he is not quick enough, it spouts and spills, because the packs of milk may fall out of their baskets and break open while they rush toward him.

He does have a panic button to push that brings in a lot of help—the people with mops and buckets—but his shoes and overalls did get wet this morning.

A deluge can create a deeply affecting mood— which this young man undergoes solely as glit-tering.

 

 

“Blake Oblique” — David Ohle

“Blake Oblique”

by

David Ohle

(from Io #29, 1982)


When Blake was eighteen, he was sent to the United States where he attended Oral Roberts University. He solved the problem of school expenses by constructing his own portable home at the edge of campus. It consisted of a covered wagon built on an old auto chassis, the wooden sides being covered with a canvas roof. Inside, there was a bunk, a stove, table, chair and a rack for books. He managed to live on about $5 a month by doing his own housekeeping and eating vegetables and fruits sent to him by his wife, Catherine, all the way from 3 Fountain Court, Blake’s London home.

If one visits the Historical Museum in Tulsa, Oklahoma, even today, one can see Blake’s cozy wagon, reconstructed in painstaking detail, down to the chamber pot and its darkly waxen contents.

There was a time, after his trial for sedition, when Blake learned to be idle. He wandered about from house to house, asking for crusts at back windows. He tattled and became a busybody, speaking things he oughtn’t. Arrested, he was publicly spanked, to no avail. In short order, he was haunting the alleyways, selling tobacco to innocent children, spreading gossip like butter. Again arrested, his poor feet were clubbed senseless with billy bats. He was then set loose in the icy streets. He fell asleep sitting on a gutter’s edge. By morning his feet were frozen, a sickening blue. He made his way to the Strand and begged a surgeon to take them off by any means at hand. The surgeon obliged, blowing an analgesic powder into Blake’s face before going to work with a bonesaw and a chisel. When the feet were freed of their stumps, the surgeon, one Joan Anglicus, head them into a nail keg and, for the moment, that was that. Exhausted, she lay in her bed to nap, where she dreamt of a Dutchman in wooden shoes. Waking, she went to a closet, selecting a pair of stout, birch shoetrees. Using metal clamps, carriage bolts, an auger, and tap-screws, she affixed them to Blake’s protruding ankle bone. Continue reading ““Blake Oblique” — David Ohle” →

Job, His Wife, and His Friends — William Blake

Job, His Wife, and His Friends, c.1785 by William Blake (1757-1827)

Homer and the Ancient Poets — William Blake

Homer and the Ancient Poets, 1827 by William Blake (1757-1827)

Lear and Cordelia in Prison — William Blake

Lear and Cordelia in Prison c.1779 by William Blake 1757-1827

Lear and Cordelia in Prison, c.1779 by William Blake (1757–1827)

David Delivered out of Many Waters — William Blake

David Delivered out of Many Waters c.1805 by William Blake 1757-1827

David Delivered out of Many Waters, c. 1805 by William Blake (1757–1827)

Judas Betrays Him — William Blake

Judas Betrays Him c.1803-5 by William Blake 1757-1827

Judas Betrays Him, c. 1805 by William Blake (1757–1827)

God Judging Adam — William Blake

God Judging Adam 1795 by William Blake 1757-1827

God Judging Adam, 1795 by William Blake (1757-1827)

The Blasphemer — William Blake

The Blasphemer c.1800 by William Blake 1757-1827

The Blasphemer, c. 1800 by William Blake (1757-1827)

And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the LORD, shall be put to death.

—Leviticus 24:16, King James Version

The Wandering Moon — William Blake

the-wandering-moon-1820

The Wandering Moon, 1820 by William Blake (1757-1827)

Screenshot 2018-07-20 at 12.50.15 PM

Dante Running from the Three Beasts — William Blake

blake1

Dante Running from the Three Beasts, 1827 by William Blake (1757-1827)

Screenshot 2018-06-21 at 10.50.03 AMScreenshot 2018-06-21 at 10.49.45 AMScreenshot 2018-06-21 at 10.49.11 AM

The Magic Banquet — William Blake

469894

The Magic Banquet (Illustration for Milton’s Comus), c. 1815 by  William Blake (1757–1827)

Frontispiece for The Song of Los — William Blake

s-los.e.p1.300

The Song of Los (frontispiece), 1794 by  William Blake (1757–1827)

The Primaeval Giants Sunk in the Soil — William Blake

The Primaeval Giants Sunk in the Soil 1824-7 by William Blake 1757-1827

The Primaeval Giants Sunk in the Soil, 1824–27 by William Blake (1757–1827)

Pity — William Blake

William-Blake-Pity-c.1795Screenshot 2017-04-20 at 5.38.41 PMScreenshot 2017-04-20 at 5.38.56 PMScreenshot 2017-04-20 at 5.39.13 PM

Pity, c. 1795 by William Blake (1757–1827)

The Erstwhile, B. Catling’s sequel to The Vorrh (Book acquired, 17 Feb. 2017)

img_5200

B. Catling’s sequel to The Vorrh arrived last week, reminding me that I still need to read The Vorrh. 

Publisher Vintage’s blurb: